Management of delayed intrathoracic esophageal perforation with modified intraluminal esophageal stent
- PMID: 19191858
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00927.x
Management of delayed intrathoracic esophageal perforation with modified intraluminal esophageal stent
Abstract
In this article, we reviewed our experience of treatment of the delayed intrathoracic nonmalignant esophageal perforation employing modified intraluminal esophageal stent. Between February 1990 and August 2006, eight patients were included in this study. Five patients experienced sepsis. The interval time between perforation and stent placement ranged from 36 h to 27 days (average, 8.6 days). Esophageal stenting and throracotomy for foreign body removal were performed in four patients. The remaining four patients underwent stent placement and thoracostomy. Nutrition was initiated through gastrostomy after 7 to 10 days after the stenting. The stent was removed after the patients resumed oral intake of food and the esophagogram showed that perforation was closed. There was no death in this group. Signs of sepsis remitted 1 week after stent placement. Complications included stress ulcer, stimulative cough, and pneumonia each. Stent removal ranged 32 to 120 days (average 66.7) after its placement. The stent was kept in place for 4 months to prevent formation of esophageal stricture in one patient with caustic esophageal burns. The follow-up was completed in all the patients. The mean follow-up period was 59 months (range 12-180). One patient with caustic esophageal burn underwent cicatricial esophagectomy and gastric transposition 3 years later due to the esophageal stricture. Barium swallow demonstrated that there was a diverticulum-like outpouching in one patient and slight esophageal stricture at T2 and T3 level in another. One patient developed reflux esophagitis 5 years after stent removal. All the patients finally had a normal intake of food. Modified esophageal stenting is an effective method to manage the delayed intrathoracic esophageal perforation. Prevention of stent migration and its convenient adjustment might be the major advantages of this method.
Similar articles
-
Prevention of stricture with intraluminal stenting through laparotomy after corrosive esophageal burns.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Aug;30(2):207-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.03.068. Epub 2006 Jul 7. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006. PMID: 16829082
-
Management of corrosive esophageal burns in 149 cases.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Aug;130(2):449-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.02.029. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005. PMID: 16077412
-
Postoperative esophageal leak management with the Polyflex esophageal stent.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Feb;133(2):333-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.10.008. Epub 2007 Jan 2. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007. PMID: 17258558
-
Minimally invasive repair of a late stricture in a reversed gastric tube.J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Dec;47(12):2321-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.10.007. J Pediatr Surg. 2012. PMID: 23217898 Review.
-
Self-expanding esophageal stents for the management of benign refractory esophageal strictures in children: A systematic review and review of outcomes at a single center.J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Dec;54(12):2479-2486. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.08.041. Epub 2019 Aug 30. J Pediatr Surg. 2019. PMID: 31522799
Cited by
-
Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS), partially covered SEMS and self-expandable plastic stents for the treatment of benign esophageal ruptures and anastomotic leaks.BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Feb 29;12:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-19. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 22375711 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal leaks and fistulae: What option do we have?World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug 7;26(29):4198-4217. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i29.4198. World J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32848329 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Critical Appraisal of the Impact of Oesophageal Stents in the Management of Oesophageal Anastomotic Leaks and Benign Oesophageal Perforations: An Updated Systematic Review.World J Surg. 2020 Apr;44(4):1173-1189. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05259-6. World J Surg. 2020. PMID: 31686158
-
Outcome of stent grafting for esophageal perforations: single-center experience.Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3696-3702. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5408-6. Epub 2017 Jan 11. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 28078464
-
Esophageal perforation: diagnostic work-up and clinical decision-making in the first 24 hours.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 30;19:66. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-66. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011. PMID: 22035338 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources