Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb 3;2(1):117.
doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-2-117.

Dental root canal treatment complicated by foreign body ingestion: a case report

Affiliations

Dental root canal treatment complicated by foreign body ingestion: a case report

Ramyia G Dhandapani et al. Cases J. .

Abstract

Introduction: Most foreign bodies pass through the gastrointestinal tract uneventfully. The majority of the reported literature describes the management of ingested blunt objects. However, ingestion of sharp objects can still occur with a higher rate of perforation corresponding to treatment dilemmas.

Case presentation: We report the conservative management of an inadvertently ingested sharp foreign body during a routine dental procedure and describe a management strategy for the treatment of both blunt and sharp foreign bodies.

Conclusion: Urgent endoscopic assessment and retrieval is indicated when there is a history of a recently ingested sharp foreign body or if clinical suspicion suggests that the object is located within the oesophagus. Conservative management is advocated if the object has passed through the pylorus with serial clinical assessments including daily radiographs. Surgical intervention is warranted in the presence of obstruction, perforation or peritonitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Root canal (Endodontic) file (Dent Supply, BF Mulholland Ltd, Glenavy, Northern Ireland).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Abdominal X-ray (AXR) demonstrating root canal file at the level of the L1 vertebra.
Figure 3
Figure 3
AXR on day 2 – Sharp foreign body has progressed to the hepatic flexure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
AXR on day 3 – showing no further evidence of the FB.

References

    1. Pavlidis TE, Marakis GN, Triantafyllou A, Psarras K, Kontoulis TM, Sakantamis AK. Management of ingested foreign bodies: how justifiable is a waiting policy? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18(3):286–7. - PubMed
    1. Kurkciyan I, Frossard M, Kettenbach J, Meron G, Sterz F, Roggla M, Laggner AN. Conservative management of foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract. Z Gastroenterol. 1996;34(3):173–7. - PubMed
    1. Velitchkov NG, Grigorov GI, Losanoff JE, Kjossev KT. Ingested foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract: retrospective analysis of 542 cases. World J Surg. 1996;20(8):1001–5. doi: 10.1007/s002689900152. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez-Hermosa JI, Codina-Cazador A, Sirvent JM, Martin A, Girones J, Garsot E. Surgically treated perforations of the gastrointestinal tract caused by ingested foreign bodies. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(7):701–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01401.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO, Goldstein JL, Johanson JF, Mallery JS, Raddawi HM, Vargo JJ 2nd, Waring JP, Fanelli RD, Wheeler-Harbough J. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guideline for the management of ingested foreign bodies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55(7):802–6. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70407-0. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources