[Olfactory ensheathing cells transplantation for central nervous system diseases in 1,255 patients]
- PMID: 19192871
[Olfactory ensheathing cells transplantation for central nervous system diseases in 1,255 patients]
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the therapeutic effect of olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) transplantation for central nervous system diseases.
Methods: Between November 2001 and January 2008, 1,255 participants with central nervous system diseases were enrolled in this clinical study for fetal OECs transplantation. There were 928 males and 327 females aged 1.2-87 (mean 40) years. The course of disease was (4.52 +/- 4.67) years. Among them, 656 participants suffered from chronic spinal cord injury (SCI), 457 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), 68 cerebral palsy (CP), 20 multiple sclerosis (MS), 11 the sequelae of stoke, 10 ataxia, and 33 residual diseases. The participants came from 71 countries or regions. Accidentally abortional fetal olfactory bulbs were donated voluntarily and were cultured for 2 weeks, then were transplanted.
Results: One thousand one hundred and twenty-eight cases were followed up for 2-8 weeks (mean 4 weeks) to obtain integrated data. Among them, the neurological functional amelioration was noticed in 994 participants with the overall short-term improvement rate of 88.12%. Seventy-six patients experienced the various perioperative complications with the incidence rate of 6.74%. One hundred and twenty patients with SCI received over 1 year follow-up. And according to ASIA assessment, motor scores increased from (39.82 +/- 20.25) to (44.55 +/- 18.99) points, light touch scores from (51.56 +/- 25.89) to (59.81 +/- 27.72) points, pain scores from (50.36 +/- 27.44) to (57.09 +/- 28.51) points for foreign patients (P < 0.05); motor scores increased from (40.52 +/- 20.80) to (46.45 +/- 20.35) points, light touch scores from (55.64 +/- 26.32) to (68.64 +/- 25.89) points, pain scores from (57.05 +/- 26.00) to (66.13 +/- 24.29) points for good rehabilitation Chinese patients (overall P < 0.05); motor scores from (37.03 +/- 18.52) to (38.03 +/- 18.50 points (P < 0.05), light touch scores from (45.88 +/- 22.56) to (46.63 +/- 23.09) points (P > 0.05), pain scores from (45.25 +/- 23.68) to (45.28 +/- 23.63) points (P > 0.05) for poor rehabilitation Chinese patients. Compared foreign patients and good rehabilitation Chinese patients with poor rehabilitation Chinese patients, difference in score change was remarkable (P < 0.05). One hundred and six cases of ALS, 32 CP, 8 MS, 7 ataxia, and 2 stroke sequelae were followed up for 3-48, 3-36, 2-20, 7-17, 6 and 24 months, One hundred and six cases of respectively. Majority of them (113/155, 72.9%) were benefited from OECs transplantation.
Conclusion: OECs transplantation into brain and spinal cord is feasible and safe . The therapeutic strategy is valuable treatment for such central nervous system diseases such as chronic SCI, ALS, CP and stroke sequelae and can improve the patients' neurological functions and/or decrease the progressive deterioration.
Similar articles
-
Short-term outcome of olfactory ensheathing cells transplantation for treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Sep;21(9):961-6. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007. PMID: 17933231
-
Influence factors for functional improvement after olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation for chronic spinal cord injury.Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Apr;20(4):434-8. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006. PMID: 16683451
-
Fetal olfactory ensheathing cells transplantation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: a controlled pilot study.Clin Transplant. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(6):710-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2008.00865.x. Epub 2008 Jul 31. Clin Transplant. 2008. PMID: 18673377
-
Olfactory ensheathing cells: biology in neural development and regeneration.Prog Neurobiol. 2010 Dec;92(4):517-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.08.008. Epub 2010 Sep 15. Prog Neurobiol. 2010. PMID: 20837090 Review.
-
Olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation following spinal cord injury: hype or hope?Exp Neurol. 2008 Feb;209(2):353-67. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.06.011. Epub 2007 Jun 30. Exp Neurol. 2008. PMID: 17643431 Review.
Cited by
-
Current status of cell-mediated regenerative therapies for human spinal cord injury.Neurosci Bull. 2014 Aug;30(4):671-82. doi: 10.1007/s12264-013-1438-4. Epub 2014 May 10. Neurosci Bull. 2014. PMID: 24817389 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Cell Transplantation for Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Front Cell Neurosci. 2022 Apr 4;16:860131. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.860131. eCollection 2022. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35444516 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term MRI cell tracking after intraventricular delivery in a patient with global cerebral ischemia and prospects for magnetic navigation of stem cells within the CSF.PLoS One. 2014 Jun 11;9(2):e97631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097631. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24919061 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells in chronic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2015 May;24(5):919-30. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3416-6. Epub 2014 Jul 8. Eur Spine J. 2015. PMID: 25001890
-
Cell Therapy From Bench to Bedside Translation in CNS Neurorestoratology Era.Cell Med. 2010 Jan 1;1(1):15-46. doi: 10.3727/215517910X516673. Cell Med. 2010. PMID: 21359168 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous