Binaural loudness summation for speech and tones presented via earphones and loudspeakers
- PMID: 19194294
- DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181976993
Binaural loudness summation for speech and tones presented via earphones and loudspeakers
Abstract
Objectives: Literature reviews of binaural loudness summation assume nearly perfect summation (i.e., a tone presented binaurally is assumed to be twice as loud as the same tone presented monaurally). However, some recent data and classroom demonstrations of this phenomenon using speech stimuli from a familiar visually present talker yield much less summation. Therefore, the following two hypotheses were tested using a preliminary procedure that controlled some, but not all, variables. First, the amount of binaural loudness summation is less for speech from a visually present talker than for recorded speech or tones. Second, the amount of binaural loudness summation is less when sounds are presented via loudspeakers than when sounds are presented via earphones.
Design: Three types of stimuli (monitored live-voice [MLV] spondees, recorded spondees, and tones) were presented monaurally and binaurally across a wide range of levels. The same stimuli were presented via earphones and loudspeakers in an audiometric test booth. Eight young listeners with normal hearing judged the loudness of the stimuli using magnitude estimation.
Results: The amount of binaural loudness summation was significantly less for MLV spondees than for tones or recorded spondees. Binaural loudness summation was also significantly less for loudspeaker presentation than for earphone presentation. Binaural loudness summation was found to be less than perfect (i.e., a sound presented binaurally is less than twice as loud as the same sound presented monaurally) for all conditions. The amount of binaural loudness summation was the least for MLV spondees presented via loudspeakers.
Conclusions: The present results support both hypotheses and indicate that binaural loudness summation in the loudspeaker conditions is significantly less than binaural loudness summation in typical laboratory test conditions using earphones. There may be a subjective effect resulting from expectations about loudness of a familiar, visually present talker, termed here as "Binaural Loudness Constancy."
Similar articles
-
Binaural loudness summation for speech presented via earphones and loudspeaker with and without visual cues.J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 May;131(5):3981-8. doi: 10.1121/1.3701984. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012. PMID: 22559371 Free PMC article.
-
Amplitude-mapping effects on speech intelligibility with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants.Ear Hear. 2005 Aug;26(4):381-8. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200508000-00002. Ear Hear. 2005. PMID: 16079633
-
Binaural Loudness Constancy.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;894:65-72. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_8. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016. PMID: 27080647
-
Loudness growth in individual listeners with hearing losses: a review.J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Sep;122(3):EL81. doi: 10.1121/1.2761924. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007. PMID: 17927312 Review.
-
Binaural interaction of impaired listeners. A review of past research.Audiology. 1981;20(3):181-211. doi: 10.3109/00206098109072694. Audiology. 1981. PMID: 7011289 Review.
Cited by
-
Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid: Objective Measures of Binaural Benefit.Front Neurosci. 2020 Dec 14;14:586119. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.586119. eCollection 2020. Front Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 33381008 Free PMC article.
-
Magnified interaural level differences enhance binaural unmasking in bilateral cochlear implant users.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Dec 27:2024.06.03.597254. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.03.597254. bioRxiv. 2024. Update in: J Acoust Soc Am. 2025 Feb 01;157(2):1045-1056. doi: 10.1121/10.0034869. PMID: 39314381 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Does Loudness Relate to the Strength of the Sound Produced by the Source or Received by the Ears? A Review of How Focus Affects Loudness.Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 28;12:583690. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.583690. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 33633631 Free PMC article. Review.
-
NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.Trends Amplif. 2012 Dec;16(4):211-23. doi: 10.1177/1084713812468511. Epub 2012 Nov 30. Trends Amplif. 2012. PMID: 23203416 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Loudness constancy for noise and speech: How instructions and source information affect loudness of distant sounds.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Nov;85(8):2774-2796. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02719-z. Epub 2023 Jul 18. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023. PMID: 37466907
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources