Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 May;29(5):358-63.
doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.236. Epub 2009 Feb 5.

A randomized clinical trial evaluating silicone earplugs for very low birth weight newborns in intensive care

C Abou Turk  1 , A L Williams, R E Lasky
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized clinical trial evaluating silicone earplugs for very low birth weight newborns in intensive care

C Abou Turk et al. J Perinatol. 2009 May.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether very low birth weight (VLBW) newborns (<1500 g) wearing silicone earplugs grow larger and perform better on developmental exams than controls.

Study design: VLBW newborns (n=34) were randomized to wearing earplugs or not. Hospital outcomes were abstracted from medical charts by research staff masked to intervention status. Fourteen extremely low birth weight (ELBW) newborns (<1000 g) were also evaluated at 18 to 22 months.

Result: After adjusting for birth weight, 11 surviving newborns in the earplug group were 225 g (95% CI: 45, 405) heavier at 34 weeks post menstrual age than the 13 controls. Six ELBW earplug infants scored 15.53 points (95% CI: 3.03, 28.02) higher than six controls on the Bayley Mental Development Index. Their head circumferences were 2.59 cm (95% CI: 0.97, 4.21) larger.

Conclusion: Earplugs may facilitate weight gain in VLBW newborns. Better outcomes may persist at 18 to 22 months at least in ELBW infants.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00565357.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of participants from randomization to follow-up assessment
Figure 2
Figure 2
The 23 NICU Nurses’ Responses to the Short-Answer Study Survey Questions
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Philbin MK, Lickliter R, Graven SN. Sensory experience and the developing organism: a history of ideas and view to the future. J Perinatol. 2000;20:S2–S5. - PubMed
    1. Bremmer P, Byers JF, Kiehl E. Noise and the premature infant: physiological effects and practice implications. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003;32:447–454. - PubMed
    1. Berens RJ, Weigle CG. Noise measurements during high-frequency oscillatory and conventional mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1995;108:1026–1029. - PubMed
    1. Busch-Vishniac IJ, West JE, Barnhill C, Hunter T, Orellana D, Chivukula R. Noise Levels in Johns Hopkins Hospital. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118:3629–3645. - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Environmental Health Noise: A hazard for the fetus and newborn. Pediatrics. 1997;100:724–727. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data