An integrated TAXUS IV, V, and VI intravascular ultrasound analysis of the predictors of edge restenosis after bare metal or paclitaxel-eluting stents
- PMID: 19195510
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.10.010
An integrated TAXUS IV, V, and VI intravascular ultrasound analysis of the predictors of edge restenosis after bare metal or paclitaxel-eluting stents
Abstract
We used intravascular ultrasound data after stent implantation from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI trials to determine predictors of angiographic stent edge restenosis. In the combined TAXUS IV, V, and VI trials, intravascular ultrasound was performed at implantation in 255 patients with bare metals stents (BMSs) and 276 patients with paclitaxel-eluting stents who underwent quantitative coronary angiography at 9 months. At follow-up, 6 BMSs (2.5%) had proximal edge and 6 BMSs (2.4%) had distal edge angiographic restenosis; 14 TAXUS stents (5.2%) had proximal edge and 1 TAXUS stent (0.4%) had distal edge angiographic restenosis. Although univariate analysis identified external elastic membrane, lumen areas, and plaque burden (external elastic membrane minus lumen/ external elastic membrane) as predictors of 9-month angiographic edge restenosis in the overall cohort and in BMS- and TAXUS-treated patients separately, only edge plaque burden was an independent predictor of 9-month angiographic edge restenosis. Receiver operator characteristic analysis showed that residual plaque burden, but not edge lumen area, was predictive of 9-month angiographic edge restenosis in BMS-treated patients (cutoff 47.7%, c = 0.70, p = 0.0244) and in TAXUS-treated patients (cutoff 47.1%, c = 0.69, p = 0.0137). In conclusion, residual edge plaque burden predicts stent edge restenosis after BMS or TAXUS stent implantation and the optimal plaque burden for stent edge landing zones are the same for BMSs and TAXUS stents, independent of vessel size and edge lumen dimensions.
Comment in
-
Impact of edge lumen area on edge restenosis.Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jun 1;103(11):1626; author reply 1626. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.04.002. Am J Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19463534 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Impact of post-intervention minimal stent area on 9-month follow-up patency of paclitaxel-eluting stents: an integrated intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse, Long Lesion, and Direct Stent Trials.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.005. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 20129555
-
Effect of the polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Express stent on vascular tissue responses: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound integrated analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI trials.Eur Heart J. 2007 Jul;28(13):1574-82. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm174. Epub 2007 May 31. Eur Heart J. 2007. PMID: 17540849
-
Impact of in-stent minimal lumen area at 9 months poststent implantation on 3-year target lesion revascularization-free survival: a serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI trials.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct;1(2):111-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.784660. Epub 2008 Sep 3. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008. PMID: 20031665 Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis of angiographic versus intravascular ultrasound parameters of drug-eluting stent efficacy (from TAXUS IV, V, and VI).Am J Cardiol. 2007 Aug 15;100(4):621-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.076. Epub 2007 Jun 29. Am J Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17697817 Review.
-
Recent progress in percutaneous coronary intervention: evolution of the drug-eluting stents, focus on the XIENCE V drug-eluting stent.Coron Artery Dis. 2010 Jan;21(1):46-56. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328333f550. Coron Artery Dis. 2010. PMID: 19952925 Review.
Cited by
-
Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.US Cardiol. 2020 May 4;14:e03. doi: 10.15420/usc.2020.03. eCollection 2020. US Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 39720445 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Consensus of the National Heart Center in collaboration With the Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society on the Clinical Use of Intracoronary Imaging.J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 1;36(2):137-157. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1387. eCollection 2024. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 39469526 Free PMC article.
-
When to use intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography during percutaneous coronary intervention?Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020 Oct;10(5):1429-1444. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-206. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020. PMID: 33224766 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intravascular imaging in coronary stent restenosis: Prevention, characterization, and management.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 9;9:843734. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.843734. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 36017094 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of full lesion coverage versus spot drug-eluting stent implantation for coronary artery stenoses.Yonsei Med J. 2014 May;55(3):584-91. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.3.584. Epub 2014 Apr 1. Yonsei Med J. 2014. PMID: 24719123 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources