Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Mar;64(3):403-10.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/gln035. Epub 2009 Feb 5.

Risk factors for hip fracture in older home care clients

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Risk factors for hip fracture in older home care clients

Paul Stolee et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Little information is available on hip fracture risks among community-dwelling persons receiving home care. Our aim was to identify risk factors for hip fracture from health information routinely collected for older home care clients.

Methods: This was a cohort study involving secondary analysis of data on 40,279 long-stay (>60 days) home care clients aged 65 and older in Ontario, Canada; occurrence of hip fracture as well as potential risk factor information were measured using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI)/Minimum Data Set-Home Care assessment instrument.

Results: In all, 1,003 clients (2.5%) had hip fracture on follow-up assessment. Older (85+ vs 65-74, relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.52 [0.43-0.64]) clients are at increased risk; males are at reduced risk [0.60 (0.51-0.70)]. Other risk factors include osteoporosis (1.19 [1.03-1.36]), falls (1.31 [1.15-1.49]), unsteady gait (1.18 [1.03-1.36]), use of ambulation aide (1.39 [1.21-1.59]), tobacco use (1.42, [1.13-1.80]), severe malnutrition (2.61 [1.67-4.08]), and cognitive impairment (1.30 [1.12-1.51]). Arthritis (0.86 [0.76-0.98]) and morbid obesity (0.34 [0.16-0.72]) were associated with reduced risk. Males and females demonstrated different risk profiles.

Conclusions: Important risk factors for hip fracture can be identified from routinely collected data; these could be used to identify at-risk clients for further investigation and prevention strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hallberg I, Rosenqvist AM, Kartous L, Lofman O, Wahlstrom O, Toss G. Health-related quality of life after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:834–841. - PubMed
    1. Pickett W, Hartling L, Brison RJ. Population-based study of hospitalized injuries in Kingston, Ontario, identified via the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program. Chronic Dis Can. 1997;18:61–69. - PubMed
    1. Jaglal SB, Sherry PG, Schatzker J. The impact of hip fracture in Ontario and its consequences. Can J Surg. 1996;2:105–111. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katelaris AG, Cumming RG. Health status before and mortality after hip fracture. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:557–560. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meunier PJ. Prevention of hip fractures. Am J Med. 1993;95:75S–78S. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms