Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;47(1):7-11.

[Evaluation of galactomannan antigen and beta-D-glucan value for diagnosis of chronic necrotizing pulmomary aspergillosis]

[Article in Japanese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 19198228

[Evaluation of galactomannan antigen and beta-D-glucan value for diagnosis of chronic necrotizing pulmomary aspergillosis]

[Article in Japanese]
Satoru Fujiuchi et al. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

In order to establish the reliable cut-off value of galactomannan (GM) antigen as well as that for beta-D-glucan for CNPA diagnosis, we conducted the following study. From 2001 to 2008, in a total of 1511 patients we measured GM and anti-aspergillus antibody simultaneously. These patients had chronic pulmonary disease including old tuberculosis, nontuberculous mycobacteriosis, COPD, and had bullous lung, interstitial lung disease or were suspected to have suspected to have interstitial lung disease. We designated cases as probable CNPA when the sample represented a positive anti-aspergillus antibody. We then analyzed the sensitivity and specificity according to various GM antigen values. When using the GM antigen cut-off value at 0.5, the sensitivity and specificity for CNPA were 63.4% and 68.6% respectively. Using 1.0 for cut-off value resulted in the better specificity for CNPA diagnosis. Similar analysis was performed on beta-D-glucan for CNPA diagnosis. When using D-glucan cut-off value as 20 pg/ml, the sensitivity and specificity for CNPA. These results indicate that the cut-off value of serological examination for infectious disease should be considered by the type of disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources