Effects of arm frequency during synchronous and asynchronous wheelchair propulsion on efficiency
- PMID: 19199211
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1105949
Effects of arm frequency during synchronous and asynchronous wheelchair propulsion on efficiency
Abstract
To further understand the possible underlying mechanisms of the low efficiencies in hand rim wheelchair propulsion, this study examined efficiency indices at different arm frequencies during two propulsion modes (synchronous and asynchronous). Fourteen male able-bodied participants performed VO2PEAK tests for both propulsion modes. Subsequently two sub-maximal exercise tests examining synchronous and asynchronous propulsion were completed at an individualised velocity (60% of VO2PEAK). The freely chosen arm frequency (FCF), followed by four counter-balanced trials at 60, 80, 120, and 140% of FCF were performed. Gross, net, and work efficiency were determined. Gross efficiency was significantly lower (p<0.05) at arm frequencies >100%, and participants were more efficient between 60 to 100% FCF. These arm frequencies corresponded to 76+/-22 to 126+/-36 and 70+/-18 to 116+/-30 pushes x min(-1) (synchronous and asynchronous respectively). Trends in VO2, gross and work efficiency suggest that 80% of FCF produced the best economy and efficiency during both propulsion modes (non-significant). Gross and work efficiency at 80% FCF were 6.8+/-0.7% and 13.0+/-4.6% for synchronous and 7.0+/-0.8% and 11.5+/-1.6% for asynchronous respectively. The results suggest that during both modes of propulsion the FCF is not necessarily the most efficient.
Similar articles
-
Efficiency of wheelchair propulsion and effects of strategy.Int J Sports Med. 2008 May;29(5):384-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965569. Epub 2007 Sep 18. Int J Sports Med. 2008. PMID: 17879885
-
Wheelchair propulsion: effects of experience and push strategy on efficiency and perceived exertion.Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008 Oct;33(5):870-9. doi: 10.1139/H08-072. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008. PMID: 18923561
-
Hand-rim forces and gross mechanical efficiency in asynchronous and synchronous wheelchair propulsion: a comparison.Int J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;35(3):223-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1345178. Epub 2013 Aug 14. Int J Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 23945971
-
Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics: implications for wheelchair sports.Sports Med. 2001;31(5):339-67. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200131050-00005. Sports Med. 2001. PMID: 11347685 Review.
-
Comparison of Peak Oxygen Uptake Between Upper-Body Exercise Modes: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Physiol. 2020 May 19;11:412. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00412. eCollection 2020. Front Physiol. 2020. PMID: 32508667 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Individual muscle contributions to push and recovery subtasks during wheelchair propulsion.J Biomech. 2011 Apr 29;44(7):1246-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.02.073. Epub 2011 Mar 12. J Biomech. 2011. PMID: 21397232 Free PMC article.
-
The Compact Wheelchair Roller Dynamometer.Sports Med Int Open. 2017 Jul 5;1(4):E119-E127. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-111404. eCollection 2017 Jul. Sports Med Int Open. 2017. PMID: 30539096 Free PMC article.
-
Wheelchair Propulsion Biomechanics in Junior Basketball Players: A Method for the Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Specific Training Program.Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:275965. doi: 10.1155/2015/275965. Epub 2015 Oct 12. Biomed Res Int. 2015. PMID: 26543852 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between Sprint Capacity and Acceleration of Wrists in Wheelchair Basketball Players: Design and Reliability of a New Protocol.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 2;18(19):10380. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910380. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34639679 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of wheelchair propulsion technique on upper extremity muscle demand: a simulation study.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012 Nov;27(9):879-86. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 24. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012. PMID: 22835860 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous