Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Apr;200(4):434.e1-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.005. Epub 2009 Feb 6.

Genetic background affects the biomechanical behavior of the postpartum mouse cervix

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Genetic background affects the biomechanical behavior of the postpartum mouse cervix

Catalin S Buhimschi et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: We hypothesized that the genetic makeup has an impact on the functional behavior of the uterine cervix. Therefore, we compared the biomechanical properties of uterine cervix in postpartum in 2 strains of mice that differ in their underlying regenerative collagen remodeling characteristics: MRL/MpJ+/+ (MRL: high regenerative repair) and C57BL/6 (C57: low regenerative high fibrotic repair).

Study design: Cervical tensile proprieties were assessed on day 3, 15, and 60 postpartum in MRL (n = 14) and C57 (n = 13) mice (4-5 animals at each time point). Stress-strain curves were generated using Shimadzu EZ-test instrumentation. Cervical tissue was stretched by 0.42 mm/min until rupture. Parameters of viscoelasticity including slope (a measure of stiffness), yield point (YP; moment when tissue changes its proprieties from elastic to plastic), and break point (BP; measure of tissue strength) were recorded and analyzed blindly between strains. Data were normalized to the weight of the tissue and analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance. Histological and collagen birefringence evaluation of the uterine cervix (MRL: n = 4; C57: n = 4) was performed 5 days after delivery.

Results: At 3 and 15 days postpartum, cervices of MRL mice were significantly more compliant than those of C57 (P < .001). MRL mice displayed a significant increase in stiffness from day 3 to day 60 (slope, median +/- SEM: day 3: 3.1 +/- 0.5 vs day 15: 20.3 +/- 4.9 vs day 60: 33.1 +/- 3.5 N/mm per gram; P < .001). In contrast, the stiffness of C57 cervices reached maximum on day 15 (slope day 3: 14.1 +/- 4.3 vs day 15: 40.0 +/- 6.5 N/mm per gram; P = .02) and rested at a similar level on day 60 (day 60: 26.1 +/- 7.0 N/mm per gram; day 60 vs day 15: P = .937). More force was required to reach YP in C57 on day 3 (C57: 72.5 +/- 14.7 vs MRL: 19.9 +/- 1.6 N/g; P < .001) but not on either day 15 (C57: 156.1 +/- 27.5 vs MRL: 109.2 +/- 26.0 N/g; P = .120) or on day 60 (C57: 143.4 +/- 26.5 vs MRL: 164.5 +/- 18.7 N/g; P = .412). There was a significant decrease in BP in both strains on both day 15 and day 60 compared with day 3 postpartum (P = .856 for strain, P = .008 for day). MRL mice displayed significantly less cervical collagen birefringence compared with C57 control (P < .001) but increased proteoglycan staining and increased water content.

Conclusion: We provide evidence that genetic makeup may have an impact on cervical tissue remodeling and function. There are significant differences in postpartum cervical stiffness and compliance that vary with the regenerative collagen remodeling phenotype.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Load-displacement curves of the uterine cervix
Representative load-displacement curves are shown for C57Bl/6 (Panel A) and MRL/MpJ+/+ (Panel B) at 3 days postpartum. The mid-slope of the regression lines of the linear ascending part of the curve (elastic phase) (shown in red) is a measure of material stiffness. The yield point (YP: moment when tissue changes its proprieties from elastic to plastic) and break point (BP: moment when tissue is physically disrupted) are indicated with arrows.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cervical weight post-delivery in MRL/MpJ+/+ and C57Bl/6 mice
Statistical analysis: 2-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Student-Newman-Keuls tests. * P<0.05 vs C57Bl/6; # P<0.05 vs. day 3 post-delivery of the same strain.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Analysis of the load-displacement relationships of cervices from day 3, 15 and 60 post-delivery demonstrating differences in the slope (Panel A: measure of stiffness), yield point (Panel B: measure of plasticity) and break point (Panel C: measure of strength). Statistical analysis: 2-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Student-Newman-Keuls tests. * P<0.05 vs C57Bl/6; # P<0.05 vs. day 3 post-delivery of the same strain.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Representative histological sections of the uterine cervix on day 5 post-delivery in MRL/MpJ+/+ and C57Bl/6 mice
Sections were stained with Sirius red and visualized in either polarized light (Panel A: MRL/MpJ+/+, Panel B: C57Bl/6) or white light. (Panel C: MRL/MpJ+/+, Panel D: C57Bl/6). Adjacent hematoxylin & eosin stained sections are shown in Panel E: (MRL/MpJ+/+) and Panel F (C57Bl/6). The squared areas are displayed at higher magnification in Panel G (MRL/MpJ+/+) and Panel H (C57Bl/6) after Alcian blue/neutral red staining to illustrate acid mucins stained in light blue. Arrows point to metachromatically stained mast cells. Lu: lumen of the endocervical canal. Endo: Endocervical epithelium.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Garfield RE, Saade G, Buhimschi C, Buhimschi I, Shi L, Shi SQ, Chwalisz K. Control and assessment of the uterus and cervix during pregnancy and labour. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:673–95. - PubMed
    1. Buhimschi I, Ali M, Jain V, Chwalisz K, Garfield RE. Differential regulation of nitric oxide in the rat uterus and cervix during pregnancy and labour. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1755–66. - PubMed
    1. Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Zhao G, Funai E, Peltecu G, Saade GR, Weiner CP. Biomechanical properties of the lower uterine segment above and below the reflection of the urinary bladder flap. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:691–700. - PubMed
    1. Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Malinow A, Garfield RE, Weiner CP. The forces of labor. Fetal and Maternal Medicine Reviews. 2003;14(4):273–307.
    1. Ludmir J, Sehdev HM. Anatomy and physiology of the uterine cervix. Clinic Obstet Gynecol. 2000;43:433–9. - PubMed

Publication types