Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Jul;20(4):337-63.
doi: 10.1007/BF01074285.

Syllable-internal structure and the sonority hierarchy: differential evidence from lexical decision, naming, and reading

Affiliations

Syllable-internal structure and the sonority hierarchy: differential evidence from lexical decision, naming, and reading

A Levitt et al. J Psycholinguist Res. 1991 Jul.

Abstract

Treiman (1983) and others have argued that spoken syllables are best characterized not as linear strings of phonemes, but as hierarchically organized units consisting of an onset (initial consonant or consonant cluster) and a rime (the vowel and any following consonants) and that the rime is further divided into a peak or nucleus (the vowel) and a coda (the final consonants). It has also been argued that the sonority (or vowel-likeness) of the consonant closest to the peak, which is a function of its phonetic class, may have an effect on the strength of boundaries determined by the hierarchical division of the syllable (e.g., Treiman, 1984). We examined the evidence for syllable-internal structure and for sonority in two experiments that employed visually presented stimuli and lexical decision, naming, and reading tasks. Our results provide support for the breakdown of the rime into a peak and a coda and for an effect of the sonority of the postvocalic consonant on that break. This pattern occurred only in our lexical decision tasks, so the effect is assumed to be postlexical. We did not find an effect of the onset-rime boundary, perhaps because of an unanticipated effect of word frequency. Our results are discussed in terms of phonological coding in short-term memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cognition. 1985 Feb;19(1):1-30 - PubMed
    1. Percept Psychophys. 1986 Mar;39(3):187-96 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988 Jul;14(3):398-409 - PubMed
    1. Cognition. 1983 Dec;15(1-3):49-74 - PubMed
    1. Mem Cognit. 1984 Jul;12(4):315-28 - PubMed

Publication types