Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):59-70.
doi: 10.1002/jbt.20265.

Desensitization of beta-adrenergic receptors in lung injury induced by 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide, a mustard analog

Affiliations

Desensitization of beta-adrenergic receptors in lung injury induced by 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide, a mustard analog

Syeda M Kabir et al. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2009 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

2-Choloroethyl Ethyl Sulfide (CEES) exposure causes inflammatory lung diseases, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary fibrosis. This may be associated with oxidative stress, which has been implicated in the desensitization of beta-adrenergic receptors (beta-ARs). The objective of this study was to investigate whether lung injury induced by intratracheal CEES exposure (2 mg/kg body weight) causes desensitization of beta-ARs. The animals were sacrificed after 7 days and lungs were removed. Lung injury was established by measuring the leakage of iodinated-bovine serum albumin ([(125)I]-BSA) into lung tissue. Receptor-binding characteristics were determined by measuring the binding of [(3)H] dihydroalprenolol ([(3)H] DHA) (0.5-24 nM) to membrane fraction in the presence and absence of DLDL-propranolol (10 micro M). Both high- and low-affinity beta-ARs were identified in the lung. Binding capacity was significantly higher in low-affinity site in both control and experimental groups. Although CEES exposure did not change K(D) and B(max) at the high-affinity site, it significantly decreased both K(D) and B(max) at low affinity sites. A 20% decrease in beta(2)-AR mRNA level and a 60% decrease in membrane protein levels were observed in the experimental group. Furthermore, there was significantly less stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity by both cholera toxin and isoproterenol in the experimental group in comparison to the control group. Treatment of lungs with 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase (PDE) could not abolish the difference between the control group and the experimental group on the stimulation of the adenylate cyclase activity. Thus, our study indicates that CEES-induced lung injury is associated with desensitization of beta(2)-AR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
CEES-induced lung injury. Lung injury was expressed as permeability index, which was obtained by dividing total radioactive counts of [125I]-BSA in lung by counts in 1 mL of blood from the same animal (n = 3). Asterisks indicate statistically different compared to control (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Representative Scatchard analysis of [3H] DHA binding to β-ARs in guinea pig lung membranes: (A) high-affinity (control), (B) high-affinity (CEES-exposed), (C) low-affinity (control), (D) low-affinity (CEES-exposed). The binding of [3H] DHA to the membrane was measured as described in the “Materials and Methods” section (n = 3). B = Specific binding of ligand and F = Free ligand concentration.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Inhibition of [3H] DHA binding to the lung membrane by β-antagonists. (■– ■, Atenolol; ▲— ▲, ICI-118, 551). The binding of [3H] DHA to the membrane and IC50 for the two antagonists were measured as described in the “Materials and Methods” section (n = 3).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
RT-PCR products of β-ARs gene of lung; 1 = kb+ DNA ladder; 2 = Control; 3 = CEES-exposed.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Effect of mustard gas on guinea pig lung β2-AR receptor gene expression. (A) A representative autoradiogram of Northern blot analysis, (B) bar graph of normalized densitometric values (n = 3).
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Effect of mustard gas on guinea pig lung β2-AR receptor levels. (A) Homogenate (n = 3), (B) membrane (n = 3).
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Effects of mustard gas exposure on cAMP production in guinea pig lung. (A) Dose-response curve in the presence and absence of isoproterenol (n = 3), (B) time-response curve in the presence and absence of isoproterenol (n = 3), (C) response in the presence of isoproterol and IBMX singly or in combination (n = 3).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith MG, Stone W, Crawford K, Ward P, Till GO, Das SK. A promising new treatment for mustard gas with the potential to substantially reduce the threat posed by chemical, biological and radiological agents. Jane’s Chem-Bio Web. 2003:1–5.
    1. Papirmeister B, Fenster AJ, Robinson SI, Ford RD. Sulfur mustard injury: Description of lesions and resulting incapacitations. In: Fenster AJ, editor. Medical defense against mustard gas. Toxic mechanisms and pharmacological implications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 1991. pp. 13–42.
    1. Worwser U. Toxicology of mustard gas. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1991;12:164–167. - PubMed
    1. Momeni AZ, Enshaelh S, Meghdadi SM, Amindjavaheri M. Skin manifestation of mustard gas. Clinical study of 535 patients exposed to mustard gas. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:775–780. - PubMed
    1. Calvet JH, Jarrean PH, Levame M, D’ortho MP, Lorino H, Harf A, Mavier IM. Acute and chronic respiratory effects of sulfur mustard intoxication in guinea pigs. J Appl Physiol. 1994;76:681–688. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms