Similar articles

• Key scientific findings and policy- and health-relevant insights from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Particulate Matter Supersites Program and related studies: an integration and synthesis of results.

  Solomon PA, Hopke PK, Froines J, Scheffe R. Solomon PA, et al. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2008;58(13 Suppl):S3-92. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2008. PMID: 19202993 Review.
• Evidence of political interference / EPA air pollution decision threatens public health: science disregarded, misrepresented on particulate matter standard.

  Union of Concerned Scientists. Union of Concerned Scientists. New Solut. 2007;17(1-2):7-11. doi: 10.2190/L5H1-5R15-2607-M67G. New Solut. 2007. PMID: 17434854
• Silenced science: air pollution decision-making at the EPA threatens public health.

  Rest K. Rest K. New Solut. 2007;17(1-2):13-6. doi: 10.2190/V541-6531-2614-0375. New Solut. 2007. PMID: 17434855
• Particulate matter and the environmental protection agency: setting the right standard.

  Thurston GD, Balmes JR; Environmental Health Policy Committee of the American Thoracic Society. Thurston GD, et al. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2012 Dec;47(6):727-8. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2012-0414ED. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2012. PMID: 23204434 No abstract available.
• Strengthened scientific support for the Endangerment Finding for atmospheric greenhouse gases.

  Duffy PB, Field CB, Diffenbaugh NS, Doney SC, Dutton Z, Goodman S, Heinzerling L, Hsiang S, Lobell DB, Mickley LJ, Myers S, Natali SM, Parmesan C, Tierney S, Williams AP. Duffy PB, et al. Science. 2019 Feb 8;363(6427):eaat5982. doi: 10.1126/science.aat5982. Epub 2018 Dec 13. Science. 2019. PMID: 30545843 Review.