Trend towards multiple authorship in occupational medicine journals
- PMID: 19203357
- PMCID: PMC2645424
- DOI: 10.1186/1745-6673-4-3
Trend towards multiple authorship in occupational medicine journals
Abstract
Background: There is an established trend towards an increasing number of authors per article in prestigious journals for medicine and health sciences. It is uncertain whether a similar trend occurs to the same extent in journals for specific medical specialties.
Methods: Journals focusing on occupational medicine were selected for analysis with regard to single or multiple-authorship per peer-reviewed paper. Data were collected from PubMed for publications between 1970 and 2007. These were analysed to calculate the average number of authors per multiple-author article per year and the percentage of single-author articles per year. The slope and average of these journals were then compared with that of previously studied non-occupational medicine journals.
Results: The results confirm a trend towards a linear increase in the average number of authors per article and a linear decrease in the percentage of single-author articles. The slope for the average number of authors for multiple-author articles was significantly higher in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine than in the other occupational medicine journals. Computational analysis of all articles published showed that Occupational Medicine (Oxford) had a significantly higher percentage of single-author articles than the other occupational medicine journals as well as major journals previously studied.
Conclusion: The same trend towards multiple authorship can be observed in medical specialty journals as in major journals for medicine and health sciences. There is a direct relationship between occupational journals with higher impact factors and a higher average number of authors per article in those journals.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Multiple authorship trends in prestigious journals from 1950 to 2005.Saudi Med J. 2007 Jun;28(6):927-32. Saudi Med J. 2007. PMID: 17530113
-
A descriptive analysis of authorship within medical journals, 1995-2005.South Med J. 2007 Apr;100(4):371-5. doi: 10.1097/01.smj.0000257537.51929.4b. South Med J. 2007. PMID: 17458396
-
Neuro-oncology authorship trends in gender since 1944: a systematic review of 14,020 articles from five top-tier academic journals.J Neurosurg. 2022 Nov 25;139(1):1-10. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.JNS221183. Print 2023 Jul 1. J Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 36433875
-
Authorship growth in contemporary medical literature.SAGE Open Med. 2020 Mar 30;8:2050312120915399. doi: 10.1177/2050312120915399. eCollection 2020. SAGE Open Med. 2020. PMID: 32284863 Free PMC article.
-
Gender in authorship and editorship in medical education journals: A bibliometric review.Med Educ. 2021 Jun;55(6):678-688. doi: 10.1111/medu.14427. Epub 2020 Dec 15. Med Educ. 2021. PMID: 33258140 Review.
Cited by
-
Life Science's Average Publishable Unit (APU) Has Increased over the Past Two Decades.PLoS One. 2016 Jun 16;11(6):e0156983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156983. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27310929 Free PMC article.
-
Reporting of data analysis methods in psychiatric journals: Trends from 1996 to 2018.Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Sep;28(3):e1784. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1784. Epub 2019 May 27. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019. PMID: 31134716 Free PMC article.
-
Gender differences in animal cognition science.Anim Cogn. 2023 Jul;26(4):1295-1305. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01777-y. Epub 2023 Apr 18. Anim Cogn. 2023. PMID: 37071241
-
Global Trends and Research Hotspots in Long COVID: A Bibliometric Analysis.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 21;19(6):3742. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063742. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35329428 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of research complexity and competition on the incidence and growth of coauthorship in biomedicine.PLoS One. 2017 Mar 22;12(3):e0173444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173444. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28329003 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Williams G, Hobbs R. Should we ditch impact factors? Br Med J. 2007;334:568–569. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39146.549225.BE. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Brown H. How impact factors changed medical publishing – and science. Br Med J. 2007;334:561–564. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39142.454086.AD. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Shaban S. Multiple authorship trends in prestigious journals from 1950 to 2005. Saudi Med J. 2007;28:927–932. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources