Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb 10;72(6):498-504.
doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000341933.97883.a4.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation in ALS: utility of central motor conduction tests

Affiliations

Transcranial magnetic stimulation in ALS: utility of central motor conduction tests

A G Floyd et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures as clinical correlates and longitudinal markers of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Methods: We prospectively studied 60 patients with ALS subtypes (sporadic ALS, familial ALS, progressive muscular atrophy, and primary lateral sclerosis) using single pulse TMS, recording from abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles. We evaluated three measures: 1) TMS motor response threshold to the ADM, 2) central motor conduction time (CMCT), and 3) motor evoked potential amplitude (correcting for peripheral changes). Patients were evaluated at baseline, compared with controls, and followed every 3 months for up to six visits. Changes were analyzed using generalized estimation equations to test linear trends with time.

Results: TMS threshold, CMCT, and TMS amplitude correlated (p < 0.05) with clinical upper motor neuron (UMN) signs at baseline and were different (p < 0.05) from normal controls in at least one response. Seventy-eight percent of patients with UMN (41/52) and 50% (4/8) of patients without clinical UMN signs had prolonged CMCT. All three measures revealed significant deterioration over time: TMS amplitude showed the greatest change, decreasing 8% per month; threshold increased 1.8% per month; and CMCT increased by 0.9% per month.

Conclusions: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) findings, particularly TMS amplitude, can objectively discriminate corticospinal tract involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) from controls and assess the progression of ALS. While central motor conduction time and response threshold worsen by less than 2% per month, TMS amplitude decrease averages 8% per month, and may be a useful objective marker of disease progression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure Longitudinal tracings from a sample patient with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from prestudy through visits 1 to 6 Amplitude and time are standardized across all visits. (A) Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor evoked potential (MEP) responses from cortical stimulation over the vertex. Traces are from the right and left abductor digiti minimi (ADM) (A1 and A2), right and left tibialis anterior (TA) (A3 and A4). (B) Peripheral MEP responses stimulating over the cervical spine to the right and left ADM (B5 and B6), and lumbar spine to the right and left TA (B7 and B8).

References

    1. Ince PG, Evans J, Knopp M, et al. Corticospinal tract degeneration in the progressive muscular atrophy variant of ALS. Neurology 2003;60:1252–1258. - PubMed
    1. Iwanaga K, Hayashi S, Oyake M, et al. Neuropathology of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis of long duration. J Neurol Sci 1997;146:139–143. - PubMed
    1. Leung D, Hays A, Geysu K, DelBene M, Rowland L. Diagnosis of ALS: clinico-pathologic analysis of 76 autopsies. Neurology 1999;52:A164.
    1. Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Profice P, et al. The diagnostic value of motor evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 1999;110:1297–1307. - PubMed
    1. Pouget J, Trefouret S, Attarian S. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): compared sensitivity of different motor response parameters in ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2000;1 suppl 2:S45–S49. - PubMed

Publication types