Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2009 Mar;6(3):126-7.
doi: 10.1038/ncpuro1312. Epub 2009 Feb 10.

Should patients undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma have a lymph node dissection?

Affiliations
Comment

Should patients undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma have a lymph node dissection?

Stephen H Culp et al. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

While several retrospective studies have suggested a possible benefit of lymph node dissection (LND) for patients with clinically node-positive renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the value of LND in patients with clinically node-negative RCC has remained uncertain. LND undoubtedly improves the accuracy of staging and provides better prognostic information; however, much debate surrounds the impact of LND on progression-free and overall survival in patients with RCC. Additionally, the question remains as to whether LND at nephrectomy is associated with increased morbidity. The final results of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized phase III trial 30881 demonstrate that complete LND at nephrectomy does not affect the survival of patients with clinical N0M0 RCC. Importantly, no increase in morbidity was noted in patients who underwent an extended LND compared with no LND, indicating that the performance of LND is unlikely to increase the risk to the patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):864-9 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2006 Feb;49(2):324-31 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2004 Aug;172(2):465-9 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2076-83 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2009 Jan;55(1):28-34 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources