Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Jun;32(3):260-73.
doi: 10.1002/nur.20320.

Randomized controlled trial of SPIRIT: an effective approach to preparing African-American dialysis patients and families for end of life

Mi-Kyung Song  1 , Sandra E Ward, Mary Beth Happ, Beth Piraino, Heidi S Donovan, Anne-Marie Shields, Mary C Connolly
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized controlled trial of SPIRIT: an effective approach to preparing African-American dialysis patients and families for end of life

Mi-Kyung Song et al. Res Nurs Health. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

This randomized controlled trial tested an intervention, Sharing Patients' Illness Representations to Increase Trust (SPIRIT), designed to enhance communication regarding end-of-life care between African Americans with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and their chosen surrogate decision makers (N = 58 dyads). We used surveys and semi-structured interviews to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of SPIRIT on patient and surrogate outcomes at 1 week and 3 months post-intervention. We also evaluated patients' deaths and surrogates' end-of-life decision making to assess surrogates' perceptions of benefits and limitations of the SPIRIT while facing end-of-life decisions. We found that SPIRIT promoted communication between patients and their surrogates and was effective and well received by the participants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Participants’ Progress in the Study
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of Dyads Who Improved Dyad Congruence and Surrogate Decision Making Confidence by Group Note. “Improved” included the combination of congruent dyad + confident surrogate (score ≥ 3); “Not Improved” included three combinations, incongruent dyad + unconfident surrogate (score ≤ 2), incongruent dyad + confident surrogate, and congruent dyad + unconfident surrogate.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Participants’ Experiences with SPIRIT Described During Acceptability Interviews Note. Each description was counted only once even if the individual mentioned it more than once.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Atkinson MJ, Wishart PM, Wasil BI, Robinson JW. The Self-Perception and Relationships Tool (S-PRT): A novel approach to the measurement of subjective health-related quality of life. Health and Quality Life Outcomes. 2004;2(1):36–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baer JS, Ball SA, Campbell BK, Miele GM, Schoener EP, Tracy K. Training and fidelity monitoring of behavioral interventions in multi-site addictions research. Drug & Alcohol Dependence. 2007;87(2–3):107–118. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blank RH, Merrick JC. End-of-life decision making: A cross-national study. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2005.
    1. Braun UK, Beyth RJ, Ford ME, McCullough LB. Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision making. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2008;23(3):267–274. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carr D, Khodyakov D. End-of-life health care planning among young-old adults: An assessment of psychosocial influences. Journal of Gerontology. 2007a;62(2):S135–S141. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms