Activation amplitude patterns do not change for back muscles but are altered for abdominal muscles between dominant and non-dominant hands during one-handed lifts
- PMID: 19205724
- DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-0994-9
Activation amplitude patterns do not change for back muscles but are altered for abdominal muscles between dominant and non-dominant hands during one-handed lifts
Abstract
It is assumed when lifting with the dominant hand that the relationship between contralateral and ipsilateral trunk muscle responses are similar to when lifting with the non-dominant hand. The purpose of this study was to quantify trunk muscle activation amplitude patterns during right- and left-handed lifts. Surface electromyography (EMG) and kinematic variables were recorded from 29 healthy subjects. Minimal trunk and pelvis motion was observed. Three principal patterns accounted for 95% of the variation in the EMG data indicating minimal variation in the pattern. Significant differences in scores captured different recruitment strategies for reach and hand. Selective and differential recruitment of back sites characterized lifts at greater distances from the body, whereas co-activation between internal oblique and back sites characterized lifts closer to the body. While the results showed no handedness effect for back muscles, the external oblique responded differently between right- and left-handed lifts. Specific recruitment strategies were used to account for subtle changes in reach and asymmetrical demands.
Similar articles
-
A functional subdivision of hip, abdominal, and back muscles during asymmetric lifting.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Mar 15;26(6):E114-21. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103150-00003. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001. PMID: 11246393
-
Electromyographic assessment of trunk muscle activation amplitudes during a simulated lifting task using pattern recognition techniques.J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Dec;19(6):e505-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.09.010. Epub 2008 Nov 28. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009. PMID: 19041264
-
Trunk kinematics of one-handed lifting, and the effects of asymmetry and load weight.Ergonomics. 1996 Feb;39(2):322-34. doi: 10.1080/00140139608964462. Ergonomics. 1996. PMID: 8851536
-
Activation amplitude and temporal synchrony among back extensor and abdominal muscles during a controlled transfer task: comparison of men and women.Hum Mov Sci. 2012 Aug;31(4):863-79. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2011.08.010. Epub 2012 Mar 8. Hum Mov Sci. 2012. PMID: 22406502
-
EMG assessment of back muscle function during cyclical lifting.J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998 Aug;8(4):233-45. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(98)00010-8. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998. PMID: 9779397 Review.
Cited by
-
Test-retest reliability and construct validity of trunk extensor muscle force modulation accuracy.PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0289531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289531. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37590280 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the trunk modules in the symmetrical and three-dimensional asymmetrical trunk positions.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 5;15(1):7718. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87802-1. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40044704 Free PMC article.
-
Comparisons of Lumbar Muscle Performance Between Minimally-Invasive and Open Lumbar Fusion Surgery at 1-Year Follow-Up.Global Spine J. 2022 Jul;12(6):1192-1198. doi: 10.1177/2192568220979666. Epub 2020 Dec 17. Global Spine J. 2022. PMID: 33334181 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources