Patient and public involvement: models and muddles
- PMID: 19207798
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02519.x
Patient and public involvement: models and muddles
Abstract
Aims and objectives: This paper explores the range of models of involvement which are drawn upon in an empirical study and which are invoked in the literature and policy. The results and discussion of the study help to excavate and explore the muddle of conceptualisations of involvement and how this leads to difficulties for practitioners, patients and managers in implementing the relevant policy.
Background: Patient and public involvement has developed an important profile internationally within health and social care policy. However, its importance as a rhetorical device has not been accompanied by adequate developments in how it is operationalised.
Design: Cross-sectional study, with an intervention conducted at three sites, and non-intervention measures taken at two control sites.
Methods: This paper draws on an empirical study of involvement. Focus groups were conducted with a lung cancer team and people affected by cancer at five health boards across Scotland. Chief executives of each of these five health boards also took part in individual interviews. Participants were asked to describe their ideas of what involvement is and their application of it.
Results: A range of ways of conceptualising involvement were apparent. Few of these moved beyond the use of patient satisfaction questionnaires. At times, troubling understandings were articulated, for example, using public meetings to communicate decisions about service closures to the public.
Conclusion: The slow escalation of involvement is in part because of the myriad ways in which it is conceptualised and discussed. Thus, we conclude that one of the greatest barriers to truly integrating patient involvement into health services, policy and research is the conceptual muddle with which involvement is articulated, understood and actioned. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE. Clinicians need to be supported to seek clarity in the use and operationalisation of involvement if the agenda is to be truly adopted and strengthened.
Similar articles
-
Whose voices? Patient and public involvement in clinical commissioning.Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):484-494. doi: 10.1111/hex.12475. Epub 2016 Jun 29. Health Expect. 2017. PMID: 27358109 Free PMC article.
-
The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy.Soc Sci Med. 2007 Mar;64(6):1297-310. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Dec 13. Soc Sci Med. 2007. PMID: 17174016
-
'Taking off the suit': engaging the community in primary health care decision-making.Health Expect. 2006 Mar;9(1):70-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00364.x. Health Expect. 2006. PMID: 16436163 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring integrated care.Dan Med Bull. 2011 Feb;58(2):B4245. Dan Med Bull. 2011. PMID: 21299927 Review.
-
User and carer involvement in the training and education of health professionals: a review of the literature.Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Mar;44(3):511-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.05.013. Epub 2006 Jul 13. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007. PMID: 16842793 Review.
Cited by
-
[Public Health and Participation of Experts from Experience in Austria: a First Exploratory Survey].Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Jun;85(6):554-560. doi: 10.1055/a-1829-6899. Epub 2022 Jul 1. Gesundheitswesen. 2023. PMID: 35777423 Free PMC article. German.
-
Deliberative democracy in health care: current challenges and future prospects.J Healthc Leadersh. 2015 Dec 16;7:123-136. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S70021. eCollection 2015. J Healthc Leadersh. 2015. PMID: 29355181 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Democratic Justifications for Patient Public Involvement and Engagement in Health Research: An Exploration of the Theoretical Debates and Practical Challenges.J Med Philos. 2023 Jun 20;48(4):400-412. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhad024. J Med Philos. 2023. PMID: 37229555 Free PMC article.
-
Patient and public involvement in implementation of evidence-based guidance for musculoskeletal conditions: a scoping review of current advances and gaps.BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Oct 22;6(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00310-x. BMC Rheumatol. 2022. PMID: 36273226 Free PMC article.
-
The impacts of partnering with cancer patients in palliative care research: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022 Oct 18;16:26323524221131581. doi: 10.1177/26323524221131581. eCollection 2022. Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022. PMID: 36274787 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical