Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;44(3):843-61.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00946.x. Epub 2009 Feb 4.

Managed care quality of care and plan choice in New York SCHIP

Affiliations

Managed care quality of care and plan choice in New York SCHIP

Hangsheng Liu et al. Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether low-income parents of children enrolled in the New York State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) choose managed care plans with better quality of care.

Data sources: 2001 New York SCHIP evaluation data; 2001 New York State Managed Care Plan Performance Report; 2000 New York State Managed Care Enrollment Report.

Study design: Each market was defined as a county. A final sample of 2,325 new enrollees was analyzed after excluding those in markets with only one SCHIP plan. Plan quality was measured using seven Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey (CAHPS) and three Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) scores. A conditional logit model was applied with plan and individual/family characteristics as covariates.

Principle findings: There were 30 plans in the 45 defined markets. The choice probability increased 2.5 percentage points for each unit increase in the average CAHPS score, and the association was significantly larger in children with special health care needs. However, HEDIS did not show any statistically significant association with plan choice.

Conclusions: Low-income parents do choose managed care plans with higher CAHPS scores for their newly enrolled children, suggesting that overall quality could improve over time because of the dynamics of enrollment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abraham JM, Feldman R, Carlin C, Christianson J. The Effect of Quality Information on Consumer Health Plan Switching: Evidence from the Buyers Health Care Action Group. Journal of Health Economics. 2006;25(4):762–81. - PubMed
    1. Beaulieu ND. Quality Information and Consumer Health Plan Choices. Journal of Health Economics. 2002;21(1):43–63. - PubMed
    1. Cao Z, McGuire TG. Service-Level Selection by HMOs in Medicare. Journal of Health Economics. 2003;22(6):915–31. - PubMed
    1. Carlson MJ, Shaul JA, Eisen SV, Cleary PD. The Influence of Patient Characteristics on Ratings of Managed Behavioral Health Care. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2002;29(4):481–9. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics. “State and Local Area Intergrated Telephone Survey (SLAITS)” [accessed on March 6, 2006]. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/slaits/cshcn.htm.

Publication types

MeSH terms