Effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial
- PMID: 19208703
- PMCID: PMC2640112
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b215
Effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To assess the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of a topical alkane vapocoolant in reducing pain during intravenous cannulation in adults.
Design: Randomised double blind placebo controlled trial.
Setting: Emergency department of a metropolitan teaching hospital.
Participants: 201 adult patients (54% male), mean (SD) age 58.2 (19.5) years, who required intravenous cannulation.
Interventions: Less than 15 seconds before cannulation, the skin area was sprayed with either water (control, n=98) or vapocoolant (intervention, n=103), from a distance of 12 cm for 2 seconds. The intervention spray was a blend of propane, butane, and pentane.
Main outcome measures: Pain with cannulation and discomfort with spray, measured with a 100 mm visual analogue scale.
Results: Groups did not differ significantly in age, sex, indication for or site of cannulation, cannula size, or who cannulated the patient (P>0.05). Median (interquartile range) pain scores for cannulation in the control and intervention groups were 36 (19-51) and 12 (5-40) mm, respectively (P<0.001), and 59 (60%) and 33 (32%) reported pain scores >or=30 mm (P<0.001). Scores for spray discomfort also differed significantly (P<0.001) because of skewing to the right within the intervention group. The median discomfort scores, however, were 0 mm in both groups. Success rates for first cannulation attempt did not differ between groups (P=0.39). Thirty four (39%) and 62 (62%) patients said they would choose the spray they received for analgesia in the future (P=0.002). At follow-up at five days, two patients in the intervention group reported transient skin redness.
Conclusions: Topical alkane vapocoolant spray is effective, acceptable, and safe in reducing pain with peripheral intravenous cannulation in adults in the emergency department.
Trial registration: Australian Clinical Trials ACTRN12607000470493.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Comment in
-
Minimising pain during intravenous cannulation.BMJ. 2009 Feb 10;338:a2993. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2993. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19208702 No abstract available.
References
-
- Biro P, Meier T, Cummins AS. Comparison of topical anaesthesia methods for venous cannulation in adults. Eur J Pain 1997;1:37-42. - PubMed
-
- Armstrong P, Young C, McKeown D. Ethyl chloride and venepuncture pain: a comparison with intradermal lidocaine. Can J Anaesth 1990;37:656-8. - PubMed
-
- Norris WD. The use of local anaesthesia in peripheral venous cannulation: current practice of junior doctors. J R Nav Med Serv 2002;88:62-4. - PubMed
-
- Todd KH, Funk JP. The minimum clinically important difference in physician-assigned visual analog pain scores. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:142-6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical