Predictors of decision making in families at risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer
- PMID: 19210016
- PMCID: PMC3947576
- DOI: 10.1037/a0012714
Predictors of decision making in families at risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with decision making about inherited cancer risk information within families and determine the interdependence between survivors' and relatives' decision making.
Design: A descriptive, cross-sectional design using a population-based sample of 146 dyads (N = 292) was used. Analyses included multilevel modeling using the Actor-Partner-Interdependence Model.
Main outcome measures: Decision making regarding inherited cancer risk information.
Results: Several individual and family factors contributed toward survivors' and female relatives' decision making about inherited cancer risk information. Individual factors included the individual's perceptions of their family communication and cancer history. Family factors included survivors' and family members' age, communication and coping style that influenced the decision making of the other member of the dyad. Cancer worries and a monitoring coping style affected both seeking and avoiding decision making for survivors and relatives.
Conclusions: In view of the importance of genetic information upon family health outcomes, it is critical to address both individual and family factors that may influence decision making about cancer risk information and surveillance options for all members within the family.
(c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Risk perception and cancer worries in families at increased risk of familial breast/ovarian cancer.Psychooncology. 2008 Aug;17(8):756-66. doi: 10.1002/pon.1370. Psychooncology. 2008. PMID: 18613300 Free PMC article.
-
Communication and decision-making about seeking inherited cancer risk information: findings from female survivor-relative focus groups.Psychooncology. 2006 Mar;15(3):193-208. doi: 10.1002/pon.935. Psychooncology. 2006. PMID: 16100704
-
Concerns and recommendations regarding inherited cancer risk: the perspectives of survivors and female relatives.J Cancer Educ. 2007 Fall;22(3):168-73. doi: 10.1007/BF03174331. J Cancer Educ. 2007. PMID: 17760523
-
Factors influencing intrafamilial communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic information.Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 Jul;17(7):872-80. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.33. Epub 2009 Mar 25. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009. PMID: 19319160 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of decision aids for female BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a systematic review.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Aug 1;19(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0872-2. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019. PMID: 31370837 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives.Fam Cancer. 2011 Mar;10(1):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s10689-010-9385-y. Fam Cancer. 2011. PMID: 20852944 Free PMC article.
-
Dispositional cancer worry: convergent, divergent, and predictive validity of existing scales.J Psychosoc Oncol. 2010;28(5):470-89. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2010.498459. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20730660 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized trial of print messaging: the role of the partner and monitoring style in promoting provider discussions about prostate cancer screening among African American men.Psychooncology. 2014 Apr;23(4):404-11. doi: 10.1002/pon.3437. Epub 2013 Oct 15. Psychooncology. 2014. PMID: 24130097 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The impact of physicians' reactions to uncertainty on patients' decision satisfaction.J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Aug;17(4):575-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01520.x. Epub 2010 Aug 3. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011. PMID: 20695949 Free PMC article.
-
Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):413-22. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9483-0. Epub 2012 Jan 26. J Genet Couns. 2012. PMID: 22278220
References
-
- American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2008. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2008.
-
- Armstrong K, Calzone K, Stopfer J, Fitzgerald G, Coyne J, Weber B. Factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2000;9:1251–1254. - PubMed
-
- Babb SA, Swisher EM, Heller HN, Whelan AJ, Mutch DG, Herzog TJ, et al. Qualitative evaluation of medical information processing needs of 60 women choosing ovarian cancer surveillance or prophylactic oophorectomy. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 2002;11:81–96. - PubMed
-
- Bleiker EMA, Hahn DEE, Aaronson NK. Psychosocial issues in cancer genetics. Acta Oncologica. 2003;42:276–286. - PubMed
-
- Bluman LG, Rimer BK, Berry DA, Borstelmann N, Iglehart JD, Regan K, et al. Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1999;17:1040–1046. - PubMed