Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Jan;135(1):50-68.
doi: 10.1037/a0014411.

Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information

Affiliations
Review

Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information

Daniel J Acheson et al. Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan.

Erratum in

  • Psychol Bull. 2010 May;136(3):350

Abstract

Verbal working memory (WM) tasks typically involve the language production architecture for recall; however, language production processes have had a minimal role in theorizing about WM. A framework for understanding verbal WM results is presented here. In this framework, domain-specific mechanisms for serial ordering in verbal WM are provided by the language production architecture, in which positional, lexical, and phonological similarity constraints are highly similar to those identified in the WM literature. These behavioral similarities are paralleled in computational modeling of serial ordering in both fields. The role of long-term learning in serial ordering performance is emphasized, in contrast to some models of verbal WM. Classic WM findings are discussed in terms of the language production architecture. The integration of principles from both fields illuminates the maintenance and ordering mechanisms for verbal information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The multicomponent model of working memory. From “Is Working Memory Still Working?” by A. D. Baddeley, 2001, American Psychologist, 56, p. 858. Copyright 2001 by the American Psychological Association. Adapted with permission. Boxes in gray represent additions from the original model proposed by Baddeley and Hitch (1974). a Addition of the episodic buffer is from Baddeley (2000). b Discussion of interactions with long-term memory is from Baddeley (2001).
Figure 2
Figure 2
A connectionist model of single word production. From “The Emergence of Phonology From the Interplay of Speech Comprehension and Production: A Distributed Connectionist Approach,” by D. C. Plaut and C. T. Kello, 1999, in B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The Emergence of Language (p. 390), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Copyright 1999 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted with permission.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acheson DJ, MacDonald MC. Twisting tongues and memories: Explorations into the relationship between language production and verbal working memory. Manuscript submitted for publication 2008 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aldridge JW, Farrell MT. Long-term recency effects in free recall. American Journal of Psychology. 1977;90:475–479.
    1. Allport A. Auditory-verbal short-term memory and conduction aphasia. In: Buoma H, Bouwhuis DG, editors. Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes. London: Erlbaum; 1984. pp. 313–326.
    1. Baars BJ, Motley MT, MacKay DG. Output editing lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior. 1975;14:382–391.
    1. Baddeley AD. Immediate memory and the “perception” of letter sequences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1964;16:364–367.

Publication types