Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory
- PMID: 19210081
- DOI: 10.1037/a0013865
Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory
Abstract
Criterion- versus distribution-shift accounts of frequency and strength effects in recognition memory were investigated with Type-2 signal detection receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, which provides a measure of metacognitive monitoring. Experiment 1 demonstrated a frequency-based mirror effect, with a higher hit rate and lower false alarm rate, for low frequency words compared with high frequency words. In Experiment 2, the authors manipulated item strength with repetition, which showed an increased hit rate but no effect on the false alarm rate. Whereas Type-1 indices were ambiguous as to whether these effects were based on a criterion- or distribution-shift model, the two models predict opposite effects on Type-2 distractor monitoring under some assumptions. Hence, Type-2 ROC analysis discriminated between potential models of recognition that could not be discriminated using Type-1 indices alone. In Experiment 3, the authors manipulated Type-1 response bias by varying the number of old versus new response categories to confirm the assumptions made in Experiments 1 and 2. The authors conclude that Type-2 analyses are a useful tool for investigating recognition memory when used in conjunction with more traditional Type-1 analyses.
Similar articles
-
Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: evidence from reaction time distributions.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Mar;36(2):484-99. doi: 10.1037/a0018435. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010. PMID: 20192544
-
Separating mnemonic process from participant and item effects in the assessment of ROC asymmetries.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):224-32. doi: 10.1037/a0017682. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010. PMID: 20053058
-
No special K! A signal detection framework for the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Feb;136(1):1-22. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.1. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007. PMID: 17324082
-
Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review.Psychol Bull. 2007 Sep;133(5):800-32. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.800. Psychol Bull. 2007. PMID: 17723031 Review.
-
A critical comparison of discrete-state and continuous models of recognition memory: implications for recognition and beyond.Psychol Bull. 2013 Nov;139(6):1173-203. doi: 10.1037/a0033044. Epub 2013 Jun 3. Psychol Bull. 2013. PMID: 23731174 Review.
Cited by
-
Confounding in Studies on Metacognition: A Preliminary Causal Analysis Framework.Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 21;11:1933. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01933. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32982828 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Metacognitive asymmetries in visual perception.Neurosci Conscious. 2021 Jun 21;2021(1):niab005. doi: 10.1093/nc/niab005. eCollection 2021. Neurosci Conscious. 2021. PMID: 34164152 Free PMC article.
-
When Memory and Metamemory Align: How Processes at Encoding Influence Delayed Judgment-of-Learning Accuracy.J Intell. 2022 Nov 11;10(4):101. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040101. J Intell. 2022. PMID: 36412781 Free PMC article.
-
Recovering the variance of d' from hit and false alarm statistics.Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):1-22. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1181-x. Behav Res Methods. 2020. PMID: 30684227
-
Blind insight: metacognitive discrimination despite chance task performance.Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec;25(12):2199-208. doi: 10.1177/0956797614553944. Epub 2014 Nov 10. Psychol Sci. 2014. PMID: 25384551 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources