Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Apr;36(4):351-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.11.017. Epub 2009 Feb 11.

Considerations for an obesity policy research agenda

Robin A McKinnon  1 , C Tracy Orleans, Shiriki K Kumanyika, Debra Haire-Joshu, Susan M Krebs-Smith, Eric A Finkelstein, Kelly D Brownell, Joseph W Thompson, Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Affiliations
Review

Considerations for an obesity policy research agenda

Robin A McKinnon et al. Am J Prev Med. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

The rise in obesity levels in the U.S. in the past several decades has been dramatic, with serious implications for public health and the economy. Experiences in tobacco control and other public health initiatives have shown that public policy may be a powerful tool to effect structural change to alter population-level behavior. In 2007, the National Cancer Institute convened a meeting to discuss priorities for a research agenda to inform obesity policy. Issues considered were how to define obesity policy research, key challenges and key partners in formulating and implementing an obesity policy research agenda, criteria by which to set research priorities, and specific research needs and questions. Themes that emerged were: (1) the embryonic nature of obesity policy research, (2) the need to study "natural experiments" resulting from policy-based efforts to address the obesity epidemic, (3) the importance of research focused beyond individual-level behavior change, (4) the need for economic research across several relevant policy areas, and (5) the overall urgency of taking action in the policy arena. Moving forward, timely evaluation of natural experiments is of especially high priority. A variety of policies intended to promote healthy weight in children and adults are being implemented in communities and at the state and national levels. Although some of these policies are supported by the findings of intervention research, additional research is needed to evaluate the implementation and quantify the impact of new policies designed to address obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Identified obesity policy research topic areas
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. U.S. DHHS. With understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health. 2nd. Vol. 2. U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000. Healthy People 2010.
    1. Kumanyika SK, Jeffery RW, Morabia A, Ritenbaugh C, Antipatis VJ. Obesity prevention: the case for action. Int J Obes. 2002;26:425–36. - PubMed
    1. Must A, Spadano J, Coakley E, Field A, Colditz C, Dietz W. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA. 1999;282(16):1523–9. - PubMed
    1. Pi-Sunyer F. The obesity epidemic: pathosphysiology and consequences of obesity. Obes Res. 2002;10(2):97S–104S. S. - PubMed
    1. Finkelstein EA, Fiebelkorn IC, Wang G. National medical spending attributable to overweight and obesity: how much and who's paying? Health Aff. 2003;W3:219–26. - PubMed