Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery
- PMID: 19212171
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318193425a
Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery
Abstract
Background: Earlier meta-analyses of small randomized trials suggested that mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) should be omitted before colorectal surgery because it does not affect complication rates 0 mortality and may be even harmful; however, more recent large randomized trials suggested an increased occurrence of pelvic abscesses in the absence of MBP. Therefore, an updated large meta-analysis was conducted to re-evaluate the role of MBP in colorectal surgery. Furthermore, the influence of different kind of MBP regimes on infectious outcomes was examined.
Methods: The meta-analysis was conducted according to the QUOROM statement; the inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials comparing MBP with no MBP before colorectal surgery. The primary outcome was anastomotic leakage; secondary outcomes were other septic complications.
Results: Fourteen trials were included with a total number of 4859 patients: 2452 in the MBP group and 2407 in the no MBP group. We found no statistical difference between the groups for anastomotic leakage [OR = 1.12 (0.82-1.53), P = 0.46], pelvic or abdominal abscess (P = 0.75), and wound sepsis (P = 0.11). When all surgical site infections were considered, the meta-analysis favored no MBP [OR = 1.40 (1.05-1.87), P = 0.02].Sensitivity analyses showed similar results for all subgroups but when poor or small trials were excluded, there was a slightly higher risk of deep abdominal abscesses with no MBP, however, the number needed to harm was as high as 333 patients, suggesting this difference to be not clinically relevant. The use of different MBP regimes did not influence primary and secondary outcomes. The main limitation concerned rectal surgery for which the limited data preclude any interpretation.
Conclusion: Although it did not confirm the harmful effect of mechanical bowel preparation (suggested by previous meta-analyses), this meta-analysis including almost 5000 patients, demonstrates with a high level of evidence that any kind of mechanical bowel preparation should be omitted before colonic surgery.
Comment in
-
Review: mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery does not provide any benefit and may be harmful.Evid Based Nurs. 2009 Oct;12(4):114. doi: 10.1136/ebn.12.4.114. Evid Based Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19779081 No abstract available.
-
The role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery.Natl Med J India. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):76-7. Natl Med J India. 2009. PMID: 19852343 No abstract available.
-
Long-term outcomes following mechanical bowel preparation in elective colonic resection.Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):577; author reply 577. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d0ce6e. Ann Surg. 2010. PMID: 20101168 No abstract available.
-
Don't give up on bowel preps-yet.Ann Surg. 2010 Jul;252(1):200; author reply 200-1. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e48d2f. Ann Surg. 2010. PMID: 20562680 No abstract available.
-
A regional survey of the use of mechanical bowel preparations prior to colorectal surgery.Ann Surg. 2011 Apr;253(4):839; author reply 839-40. doi: 10.1097/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318211d8a9. Ann Surg. 2011. PMID: 21475031 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
