Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;35(2):68-72.
doi: 10.1080/00952990802585406.

Lack of reduction in buprenorphine injection after introduction of co-formulated buprenorphine/naloxone to the Malaysian market

Affiliations

Lack of reduction in buprenorphine injection after introduction of co-formulated buprenorphine/naloxone to the Malaysian market

R Douglas Bruce et al. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2009.

Abstract

Background: Diversion of buprenorphine (BPN) has been described in settings where it is legally prescribed and has resulted in increasing concern. To address this concern, co-formulation of buprenorphine/naloxone (BPN/NLX) replaced buprenorphine alone in Malaysia in December 2006.

Methods: To assess the significance of BPN/NLX introduction, 41 BPN/NLX injectors in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia were recruited using a modified snowball recruitment technique.

Results: In January 2007, all subjects had previously injected BPN alone. During the transition from injecting BPN alone to co-formulated BPN/NLX, the mean daily BPN injection dose increased from 1.88 mg (range 1.0-4.0 mg) to 2.49 mg/day (p < .001). Overall, 18 (44%) subjects increased their daily amount of injection while 22 (54%) had no change in dose; only one subject reduced the amount of injection. Development of opioid withdrawal symptoms was the primary outcome, however the only symptom that was significantly associated with BPN/NLX dosage was the report of "stomach pains" (p = .01). In logistic regression analysis, the development of opioid withdrawal symptoms was associated with increased benzodiazepine injection and increased syringe sharing.

Conclusion and scientific significance: These data suggests that the introduction of BPN/NLX did not reduce injection related risk behaviors such as syringe sharing and was associated with increased benzodiazepine use. Evidence-based approaches to treat BPN injection are urgently needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interest The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

References

    1. Bruce RD, Altice FL, Friedland GH. HIV Disease among Substance Users: Treatment Issues. In: Volberding P, editor. Global HIV/AIDS Medicine. New York: Elsevier; 2007.
    1. Bruce RD, Altice FL. Clinical care of the HIV-infected drug user. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2007;21:149–179. ix. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auriacombe M, Fatseas M, Dubernet J, Daulouede JP, Tignol J. French field experience with buprenorphine. American Journal on Addictions. 2004;13(Suppl 1):S17–28. - PubMed
    1. Jenkinson RA, Clark NC, Fry CL, Dobbin M. Buprenorphine diversion and injection in Melbourne, Australia: an emerging issue? Addiction. 2005;100:197–205. - PubMed
    1. Loo HW, Yam AK, Tan TC, Peng YP, Teoh LC. Severe upper limb complications from parenteral abuse of Subutex. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2005;34:575–578. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms