Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug;135(8):1109-16.
doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0552-1. Epub 2009 Feb 12.

The effect of post-irradiation tumor oxygenation status on recovery from radiation-induced damage in vivo: with reference to that in quiescent cell populations

Affiliations

The effect of post-irradiation tumor oxygenation status on recovery from radiation-induced damage in vivo: with reference to that in quiescent cell populations

Shin-ichiro Masunaga et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To elucidate the effect of tumor oxygenation status on recovery from damage following gamma-ray or accelerated carbon ion irradiation in vivo, including in quiescent (Q) cells.

Methods: SCC VII tumor-bearing mice were continuously given 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) to label all proliferating (P) cells. They received gamma-ray or accelerated carbon ion irradiation with or without tumor clamping for inducing hypoxia. Immediately after irradiation, cells from some tumors were isolated, or acute hypoxia-releasing nicotinamide was loaded to the tumor-bearing mice. For 9 h after irradiation, some tumors were kept aerobic or hypoxic. Then isolated tumor cells were incubated with a cytokinesis blocker. The response of Q cells was assessed in terms of the micronucleus frequency using immunofluorescence staining for BrdU. That of the total (=P + Q) tumor cells was determined from BrdU non-treated tumors.

Results: Clearer recovery in Q cells than total cells and after aerobic than hypoxic gamma-ray irradiation was efficiently suppressed with carbon ion beams. Inhibition of recovery through keeping irradiated tumors hypoxic after irradiation and promotion of recovery by nicotinamide loading were observed more clearly with gamma-rays, after aerobic irradiation and in total cells than with carbon ion beams, after hypoxic irradiation and in Q cells, respectively.

Conclusions: Tumor oxygenation status following irradiation can manipulate recovery from radiation-induced damage, especially after aerobic gamma-ray irradiation in total cells. Carbon ion beams are promising because of their efficient suppression of the recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cell survival curves for total tumor cells as a function of radiation dose immediately and 9 h after irradiation. The data after γ-ray and accelerated carbon ion irradiation are shown in the left and right panels, respectively. The data after irradiation under aerobic and hypoxic conditions are shown in the upper and lower panels, respectively. Open circles, open triangles, solid triangles, and open squares represent the surviving fractions immediately after irradiation, after keeping tumors aerobic for 9 h following irradiation, after keeping tumors hypoxic for 9 h following irradiation, and after keeping tumors aerobic for 9 h following the administration of nicotinamide (NA) immediately after irradiation, respectively. Bars represent standard errors
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Dose–response curves of normalized micronucleus frequency for total tumor cells as a function of radiation dose immediately and 9 h after irradiation. The data after γ-ray and accelerated carbon ion irradiation are shown in the left and right panels, respectively. The data after irradiation under aerobic and hypoxic condition are shown in the upper and lower panels, respectively. Symbols are as in Fig. 1. Bars represent standard errors
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Dose–response curves of normalized micronucleus frequency for quiescent tumor cells as a function of radiation dose immediately and 9 h after irradiation. The data after γ-ray and accelerated carbon ion irradiation are shown in the left and right panels, respectively. The data after irradiation under aerobic and hypoxic condition are shown in the upper and lower panels, respectively. Symbols are as in Fig. 1. Bars represent standard errors

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chan N, Koritzinsky M, Zhao H, Bindra R, Glazer PM, Powell S, Belmaaza A, Wouters B, Bristow RG (2008) Chronic hypoxia decreases synthesis of homologous recombination proteins to offset chemoresistance and radioresistance. Cancer Res 68:605–614. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5472 - PubMed
    1. Chaplin DJ, Horsman MR, Trotter MJ (1990) Effect of nicotinamide on the microregional heterogeneity of oxygen delivery within a murine tumor. J Natl Cancer Inst 82:672–676. doi:10.1093/jnci/82.8.672 - PubMed
    1. Hada M, Georgakilas AG (2008) Formation of clustered DNA damage after high-LET irradiation: a review. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 49:203–210. doi:10.1269/jrr.07123 - PubMed
    1. Hall EJ (2006) Repair of radiation damage and the dose-rate effect. In: Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ (eds) Radiobiology for the radiologist, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 60–84
    1. Masunaga S, Ono K (2002) Significance of the response of quiescent cell populations within solid tumors in cancer therapy. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 43:11–25. doi:10.1269/jrr.43.11 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances