Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jul;20(7):1563-70.
doi: 10.1007/s10856-009-3701-9. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

Comparison of an experimental bone cement with a commercial control, Hydroset

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of an experimental bone cement with a commercial control, Hydroset

O M Clarkin et al. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Glass polyalkenoate cements based on strontium calcium zinc silicate glasses (Zn-GPCs) and high molecular weight polyacrylic acids (PAA) (MW; 52,000-210,000) have been shown to exhibit mechanical properties and in vitro bioactivity suitable for arthroplasty applications. Unfortunately, these formulations exhibit working times and setting times which are too short for invasive surgical applications such as bone void filling and fracture fixation. In this study, Zn-GPCs were formulated using a low molecular weight PAA (MW; 12,700) and a modifying agent, trisodium citrate dihydrate (TSC), with the aim of improving the rheological properties of Zn-GPCs. These novel formulations were then compared with commercial self-setting calcium phosphate cement, Hydroset, in terms of compressive strength, biaxial flexural strength and Young's modulus, as well as working time, setting time and injectability. The novel Zn-GPC formulations performed well, with prolonged mechanical strength (39 MPa, compression) greater than both vertebral bone (18.4 MPa) and the commercial control (14 MPa). However, working times (2 min) and rheological properties of Zn-GPCs, though improved, require further modifications prior to their use in minimally invasive surgical techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58(2):188-95 - PubMed
    1. Dent Mater. 2002 Jul;18(5):376-9 - PubMed
    1. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Apr;31(4):373-8 - PubMed
    1. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998 Winter;43(4):428-32 - PubMed
    1. Hum Pathol. 2001 Oct;32(10):1136-40 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources