Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009;16(1):7-29.
doi: 10.1007/s12529-008-9002-8. Epub 2009 Feb 12.

Risk perceptions related to SARS and avian influenza: theoretical foundations of current empirical research

Affiliations
Review

Risk perceptions related to SARS and avian influenza: theoretical foundations of current empirical research

Anja Leppin et al. Int J Behav Med. 2009.

Abstract

Background: The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003 and the subsequent emergence of the H5N1 virus have highlighted the threat of a global pandemic influenza outbreak. Planning effective public health control measures for such a case will be highly dependent on sound theory-based research on how people perceive the risks involved in such an event.

Purpose: The present article aims to review theoretical models and concepts underlying current empirical research on pandemic influenza risk perception.

Method: A review was conducted based on 28 empirical studies from 30 articles which were published between 2003 and 2007.

Results: Concepts of risk perception mostly seemed more pragmatic than theory-based and were highly heterogeneous, for instance, in terms of conceptualizing risk perception as an exclusively cognitive or as a cognitive and emotional phenomenon or whether the concept was dominated by expectancy or expectancy and value components. Similarly, the majority of studies investigating risk perceptions and protective behaviors were not model-based.

Conclusions: The current body of knowledge can only provide preliminary insights. Unlike the reviewed studies, which were mostly launched as a rapid response to outbreak situations, future research will have to invest more strongly into theoretical work to provide sounder evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Smith RD. Responding to global infectious disease outbreaks: lessons from SARS on the role of risk perception, communication and management. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:3113–3133. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Savage L. The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley; 1954.
    1. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci. 1978;9:127–152. doi: 10.1007/BF00143739. - DOI
    1. Slovic P. The perception of risk. London: Earthscan; 2000.
    1. Rosenstock IM. Why people use health services. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(Suppl):127–136. - PubMed

MeSH terms