Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep;62(9):991-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.007. Epub 2009 Feb 12.

Classical test theory and item response theory/Rasch model to assess differences between patient-reported fatigue using 7-day and 4-week recall periods

Jin-Shei Lai  1 , Karon Cook, Arthur Stone, Jennifer Beaumont, David Cella
Affiliations

Classical test theory and item response theory/Rasch model to assess differences between patient-reported fatigue using 7-day and 4-week recall periods

Jin-Shei Lai et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: This study compared self-reported fatigue between 7-day and 4-week time frames and explored factors that affect patients' responses.

Study design and setting: Two hundred and sixteen cancer patients completed either 7-day or 4-week version of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F). Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistics and Cochran-Armitage trend tests were used to assess the association between time frame and item scores. Information function curves at both item and scale levels were depicted to evaluate the precision along the fatigue continuum. Differential item functioning (DIF) was used to examine the stability of the psychometric properties between time frames.

Results: Time frame did not influence patients' item responses. Examination of information function curves at item level did not clearly favor either time frame. At the scale level, the 7-day time frame was slightly more precise overall than the 4-week time frame. No item demonstrated DIF between time frames. Neither gender nor fatigue severity had an impact on above results.

Conclusion: This study suggests 7-day and 4-week time frame are equally appropriate in measuring fatigue, preference might be given to the more informative 7-day time frame. However, substantive considerations regarding the appropriate time frame should outweigh statistical ones.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparisons of item information function curves between timeframes
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scale information function curve between 7-day and 4-week timeframes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Nursing diagnoses: Definition and Classification, 1997–1998. Philadelphia, PA: McGraw-Hill; 1996.
    1. Cella D. Factors influencing quality of life in cancer patients: Anemia and fatigue. Semin Oncol. 1998;25(3 Suppl 7):43–46. - PubMed
    1. Cella D, Davis K, Breitbart W, Curt G. Cancer-related fatigue: Prevalence of proposed diagnostic criteria in a United States sample of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(14):3385–3391. - PubMed
    1. Mooney K, Ferrell BR, Nail LM, et al. Oncology Nursing Society research priorities survey. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1991;18:1381–1388. - PubMed
    1. Stone P, Richardson A, Ream E, Smith AG, Kerr DJ, Kearney N. Cancer-related fatigue: Inevitable, unimportant and untreatable? Results of a multi-centre patient survey. Cancer Fatigue Forum. Ann Oncol. 2000;11(8):971–975. - PubMed

Publication types