Evidence that patients can understand and use?
- PMID: 19216198
- DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2008.08.027
Evidence that patients can understand and use?
Abstract
The impact that research evidence can have on patients making decisions about their own care is often overlooked. Regardless of whether patients want to lead or fully participate in their care, it appears that patients still want to be informed. We have health information that patients could benefit from knowing, a growing body of evidence and experiences about how to translate this information to patients. The Cochrane Collaboration, an organisation that produces and disseminates systematic reviews of healthcare interventions, translates the evidence from their reviews into summaries for the public. Research is presently being conducted to test a format for the plain language summaries. Principles such as presenting evidence in standard qualitative statements, as relative and absolute risks, as natural frequencies, and in tables are being incorporated into the format. Groups within the Collaboration are also translating the evidence for use by patients and the public. Effective strategies are being used to target patients directly and via their physicians, such as dissemination on specific patient group websites and decision aids. Research evidence and experiences can feed into the creation of evidence that patients can understand and use.
Similar articles
-
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews.Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 23;2:81. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-81. Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24059250 Free PMC article.
-
Update of strategies to translate evidence from cochrane musculoskeletal group systematic reviews for use by various audiences.J Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;41(2):206-15. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121307. Epub 2013 Dec 1. J Rheumatol. 2014. PMID: 24293571
-
Russian translations for Cochrane.Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S112-3. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150713. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015. PMID: 26639688
-
Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.Lancet Oncol. 2008 May;9(5):485-93. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70128-1. Lancet Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18452859 Review.
-
Translating evidence-based information into effective risk communication: current challenges and opportunities.J Lab Clin Med. 2005 Apr;145(4):171-80. doi: 10.1016/j.lab.2005.02.006. J Lab Clin Med. 2005. PMID: 15962835 Review.
Cited by
-
Presenting evidence-based health information for people with multiple sclerosis: the IN-DEEP project protocol.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Mar 16;12:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-20. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012. PMID: 22424304 Free PMC article.
-
Plain language summaries: A systematic review of theory, guidelines and empirical research.PLoS One. 2022 Jun 6;17(6):e0268789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268789. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35666746 Free PMC article.
-
How to Put It Plainly? Findings From Two Randomized Controlled Studies on Writing Plain Language Summaries for Psychological Meta-Analyses.Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 16;12:771399. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771399. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34975663 Free PMC article.
-
Web search behavior and information needs of people with multiple sclerosis: focus group study and analysis of online postings.Interact J Med Res. 2014 Jul 24;3(3):e12. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3034. Interact J Med Res. 2014. PMID: 25093374 Free PMC article.
-
Development and assessment of a website presenting evidence-based information for people with multiple sclerosis: the IN-DEEP project.BMC Neurol. 2016 Mar 2;16:30. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0552-0. BMC Neurol. 2016. PMID: 26934873 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources