Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb 13:7:10.
doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-7-10.

Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball?

Dominique Roberfroid  1 , Christian Leonard, Sabine Stordeur
Affiliations

Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball?

Dominique Roberfroid et al. Hum Resour Health. .

Abstract

Background: Anticipating physician supply to tackle future health challenges is a crucial but complex task for policy planners. A number of forecasting tools are available, but the methods, advantages and shortcomings of such tools are not straightforward and not always well appraised. Therefore this paper had two objectives: to present a typology of existing forecasting approaches and to analyse the methodology-related issues.

Methods: A literature review was carried out in electronic databases Medline-Ovid, Embase and ERIC. Concrete examples of planning experiences in various countries were analysed.

Results: Four main forecasting approaches were identified. The supply projection approach defines the necessary inflow to maintain or to reach in the future an arbitrary predefined level of service offer. The demand-based approach estimates the quantity of health care services used by the population in the future to project physician requirements. The needs-based approach involves defining and predicting health care deficits so that they can be addressed by an adequate workforce. Benchmarking health systems with similar populations and health profiles is the last approach. These different methods can be combined to perform a gap analysis. The methodological challenges of such projections are numerous: most often static models are used and their uncertainty is not assessed; valid and comprehensive data to feed into the models are often lacking; and a rapidly evolving environment affects the likelihood of projection scenarios. As a result, the internal and external validity of the projections included in our review appeared limited.

Conclusion: There is no single accepted approach to forecasting physician requirements. The value of projections lies in their utility in identifying the current and emerging trends to which policy-makers need to respond. A genuine gap analysis, an effective monitoring of key parameters and comprehensive workforce planning are key elements to improving the usefulness of physician supply projections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Main steps of health workforce planning.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A framework for analysing future trends in HRH (courtesy of Dubois CA [55]).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bloor K, Maynard A, Hall J, Ulmann P, Farhauer O, Lindgren B. Planning human resources in health care: Towards an economic approach – An international comparative review. Toronto: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2003.
    1. AMWAC Medical workforce planning in Australia. Aust Health Rev. 2000;23:8–26. - PubMed
    1. Zurn P, Dal Poz M, Stilwell B, Adams O. Imbalance in the health workforce. Hum Resour Health. 2004;2:13. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-2-13. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. AHWAC . Nursing Workforce Planning in Australia – A guide to the process and methods used by the Australian Health Workforce Committee. Sydney: AHWAC; 2004.
    1. Birch S. Health human resource planning for the new millennium: inputs in the production of health, illness, and recovery in populations. Can J Nurs Res. 2002;33:109–114. - PubMed