Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr;111(1):144-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Feb 12.

Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects

Affiliations

Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects

David Anaki et al. Cognition. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

It is well established that faces, in contrast to objects, are categorized as fast or faster at the individual level (e.g., Bill Clinton) than at the basic-level (e.g., human face). This subordinate-shift from basic-level categorization has been considered an outcome of visual expertise with processing faces. However, in the present study we found that, similar to familiar faces, categorization of individually-known familiar towers is also faster at the individual level than at the basic-level in naïve participants. In addition, category-verification of familiar stimuli, at basic and superordinate levels, was slower and less accurate compared to unfamiliar stimuli. Thus, the existence of detailed semantic information, regardless of expertise, can induce a shift in the default level of object categorization from basic to individual level. Moreover, the individually-specific knowledge is not only more easily-retrieved from memory but it might also interfere with accessing more general category information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example of unfamiliar (left) and familiar (right) faces and towers (the familiar stimuli are Bar Refaeli (Israeli model) and YMCA tower (Jerusalem)).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Response latency for match (top) and no match (bottom) familiar and unfamiliar faces and towers as a function of categorization level. Error bars represent standard errors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carr TH, Dagenbach D. Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1990;16:341–350. - PubMed
    1. D’Lauro C, Tanaka JW, Curran T. The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2008;15:623–629. - PubMed
    1. Ganel T, Goshen-Gottstein Y. The perceptual integrality of sex and identity of faces: Further evidence for the single-route hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2002;28:854–867. - PubMed
    1. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ. Becoming a “Greeble” expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research. 1997;37:1673–1682. - PubMed
    1. Gibson EJ. An odyssey in learning and perception. MIT Press; 1991.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources