Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May;75(8):1097-104.
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.01.015. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

Analysis of the dissipation kinetics of ivermectin at different temperatures and in four different soils

Affiliations

Analysis of the dissipation kinetics of ivermectin at different temperatures and in four different soils

Kristine A Krogh et al. Chemosphere. 2009 May.

Abstract

The study target was to assess the usefulness of the OECD test guideline 307 for the veterinary pharmaceutical ivermectin. Laboratory microcosm studies were conducted to investigate the aerobic and anaerobic transformation of ivermectin in soils from three locations in Europe (York, Madrid and Tåstrup) and an artificial soil. The reason to include an artificial soil in the study was to understand the exposure potential of ivermectin in a parallel eco-toxicological study with non-target organisms in this soil for a longer duration. Three kinetic models (first-order (SFO), availability-adjusted first-order (AAFO) and bi-exponential first-order (BFO)) were applied to fit the observed transformation dynamics and to derive dissipation times. Dissipation rates were highly dependent on the tested soils. Under aerobic conditions, dissipation was remarkably faster in the three natural soils tested (DT(50)=16.1-36.1d) than in the artificial soil (DT(50)>500d). Furthermore, a clear increase in DT(50) values was seen when the temperature was lowered from 20 to 6 degrees C. The results indicated that dissipation in soils with comparably strong sorption and low degrees of desorption (i.e. the York soil and to some extent the Tåstrup soil) were best described by the AAFO model. While dissipation in the Madrid soil which had a lower sorption coefficient and a higher degree of reversibility of sorption could be satisfactorily described with the SFO model. Our data further showed that no significant dissipation occurred under anaerobic conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer