Warfarin thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients with central venous catheters (WARP): an open-label randomised trial
- PMID: 19217991
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60205-1
Warfarin thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients with central venous catheters (WARP): an open-label randomised trial
Abstract
Background: The role and dose of anticoagulants in thromboprophylaxis for patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy through central venous catheters (CVCs) is controversial. We therefore assessed whether warfarin reduces catheter-related thrombosis compared with no warfarin and whether the dose of warfarin determines the thromboprophylactic effect.
Methods: In 68 clinical centres in the UK, we randomly assigned 1590 patients aged at least 16 years with cancer who were receiving chemotherapy through CVCs to no warfarin, fixed-dose warfarin 1 mg per day, or dose-adjusted warfarin per day to maintain an international normalised ratio between 1.5 and 2.0. Clinicians who were certain of the benefit of warfarin randomly assigned patients to fixed-dose or dose-adjusted warfarin groups. The primary outcome was the rate of radiologically proven, symptomatic catheter-related thrombosis. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN 50312145.
Findings: Compared with no warfarin (n=404), warfarin (n=408; 324 [79%] on fixed-dose and 84 [21%] on dose-adjusted) did not reduce the rate of catheter-related thromboses (24 [6%] vs 24 [6%]; relative risk 0.99, 95% CI 0.57-1.72, p=0.98). However, compared with fixed-dose warfarin (n=471), dose-adjusted warfarin (n=473) was superior in the prevention of catheter-related thromboses (13 [3%] vs 34 [7%]; 0.38, 0.20-0.71, p=0.002). Major bleeding events were rare; an excess was noted with warfarin compared with no warfarin (7 vs 1, p=0.07) and with dose-adjusted warfarin compared with fixed-dose warfarin (16 vs 7, p=0.09). A combined endpoint of thromboses and major bleeding showed no difference between comparisons. We did not note a survival benefit in either comparison.
Interpretation: The findings show that prophylactic warfarin compared with no warfarin is not associated with a reduction in symptomatic catheter-related or other thromboses in patients with cancer and therefore we should consider newer treatments.
Funding: Medical Research Council and Cancer Research UK.
Comment in
-
Prophylaxis of catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients.Lancet. 2009 Feb 14;373(9663):523-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60178-1. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19217973 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Warfarin thromboprophylaxis in cancer did not reduce risk for catheter-related thrombosis.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jul 21;151(2):JC1-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-2-200907210-02005. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19620149 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
