Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr 15;28(8):1218-37.
doi: 10.1002/sim.3540.

Systematically missing confounders in individual participant data meta-analysis of observational cohort studies

Fibrinogen Studies CollaborationDan JacksonIan WhiteJ B KostisA C WilsonA R FolsomK WuL ChamblessM BenderlyU GoldbourtJ WilleitS KiechlJ W G YarnellP M SweetnamP C ElwoodM CushmanB M PsatyR P TracyA Tybjaerg-HansenF HaverkateM P M de MaatS G ThompsonF G R FowkesA J LeeF B SmithV SalomaaK HaraldV RasiE VahteraP JousilahtiR D'AgostinoW B KannelP W F WilsonG ToflerD LevyR MarchioliF ValagussaA RosengrenL WilhelmsenG LappasH ErikssonP CremerD NagelJ D CurbB RodriguezK YanoJ T SalonenK NyyssönenT-P TuomainenB HedbladG EngströmG BerglundH LoewelW KoenigH W HenseT W MeadeJ A CooperB De StavolaC KnottenbeltG J MillerJ A CooperK A BauerR D RosenbergS SatoA KitamuraY NaitoH IsoV SalomaaK HaraldV RasiE VahteraP JousilahtiT PalosuoP DucimetiereP AmouyelD ArveilerA E EvansJ FerrieresI Juhan-VagueA BinghamH SchulteG AssmannB CantinB LamarcheJ-P DespresG R DagenaisH Tunstall-PedoeG D O LoweM WoodwardY Ben-ShlomoG Davey SmithV PalmieriJ L YehT W MeadeA RudnickaP BrennanC KnottenbeltJ A CooperP RidkerF RodeghieroA TosettoJ ShepherdG D O LoweI FordM RobertsonE BrunnerM ShipleyE J M FeskensE Di AngelantonioS KaptogeS LewingtonG D O LoweN SarwarS G ThompsonM WalkerS WatsonI R WhiteA M WoodJ Danesh
Collaborators
Free PMC article

Systematically missing confounders in individual participant data meta-analysis of observational cohort studies

Fibrinogen Studies Collaboration et al. Stat Med. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

One difficulty in performing meta-analyses of observational cohort studies is that the availability of confounders may vary between cohorts, so that some cohorts provide fully adjusted analyses while others only provide partially adjusted analyses. Commonly, analyses of the association between an exposure and disease either are restricted to cohorts with full confounder information, or use all cohorts but do not fully adjust for confounding. We propose using a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis model to use information from all available cohorts while still adjusting for all the potential confounders. Our method uses both the fully adjusted and the partially adjusted estimated effects in the cohorts with full confounder information, together with an estimate of their within-cohort correlation. The method is applied to estimate the association between fibrinogen level and coronary heart disease incidence using data from 154,012 participants in 31 cohorts

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fully and partially adjusted estimated effects of fibrinogen level and corresponding 95 per cent confidence intervals, using the bootstrap within-cohort correlations. The line of equality is also shown.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Profile log-likelihood plot for βf using the analytic within-cohort correlations, shown in column 7 of Table I.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Profile log-likelihood plot for κ using the analytic within-cohort correlations, shown in column 7 of Table I.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The difference between fully and partially adjusted, and partially adjusted, estimated effects of fibrinogen level and corresponding 95 per cent confidence intervals. Note that the partially adjusted estimates shown here adjust for total cholesterol, and hence are not quite the same as those shown in Figure 1 or Table I.

References

    1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 1982.
    1. Blettner M, Sauerbrei W, Schlehofer B, Scheuchenpflug T, Friedenreich C. Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology Journal. 1999;28:1–9. - PubMed
    1. Stewart LA, Parmar MK. Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? The Lancet. 1993;341:418–422. - PubMed
    1. van Houwelingen HC, Arends LR. Stijnen Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Statistics in Medicine. 2002;21:589–624. - PubMed
    1. Riley RD, Abrams KR, Lambert PC, Sutton AJ, Thompson JR. An evaluation of bivariate random effects meta-analysis for the joint synthesis of two correlated outcomes. Statistics in Medicine. 2007;26:78–97. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources