Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Apr;109(1-3):24-37.
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.01.016. Epub 2009 Feb 15.

Endophenotypes in schizophrenia: a selective review

Affiliations
Review

Endophenotypes in schizophrenia: a selective review

Allyssa J Allen et al. Schizophr Res. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Given the wealth of data in the literature on schizophrenia endophenotypes, it is useful to have one source to reference their frequency data. We reviewed the literature on disease-liability associated variants in structural and functional magnetic resonance images (MRI), sensory processing measures, neuromotor abilities, neuropsychological measures, and physical characteristics in schizophrenia patients (SCZ), their first-degree relatives (REL), and healthy controls (HC). The purpose of this review was to provide a summary of the existing data on the most extensively published endophenotypes for schizophrenia.

Methods: We searched PubMed and MedLine for all studies on schizophrenia endophenotypes comparing SCZ to HC and/or REL to HC groups. Percent abnormal values, generally defined as >2 SD from the mean (in the direction of abnormality) and/or associated effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated for each study.

Results: Combined, the articles reported an average 39.4% (SD=20.7%; range=2.2-100%) of abnormal values in SCZ, 28.1% (SD=16.6%; range=1.6-67.0%) abnormal values in REL, and 10.2% (SD=6.7%; range=0.0-34.6%) in HC groups.

Conclusions: These findings are reviewed in the context of emerging hypotheses on schizophrenia endophenotypes, as well as a discussion of clustering trends among the various intermediate phenotypes. In addition, programs for future research are discussed, as instantiated in a few recent large-scale studies on multiple endophenotypes across patients, relatives, and healthy controls.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest None of the authors have a conflict of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Median effect sizes for each endophenotype are plotted with 95% CI. Outliers (denoted by “o”) and extreme cases (denoted by “*”) are labeled by author and year. Note: Outliers were included in main effects summarization tables.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average percent abnormal for each endophenotype category. The yellow line represents the expected percent abnormal (2.5%). Note: MRI results are not included in this graph, as there were no percent abnormal values for this category.

References

    1. Acker W, Toone B. Attention, eye tracking and schizophrenia. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 1978;17(2):173–181. - PubMed
    1. Adams J, Faux SF, Nestor PG, Shenton M, Marcy B, Smith S, et al. Erp abnormalities during semantic processing in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research. 1993;10(3):247–257. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adler LE, Waldo MC, Freedman R. Neurophysiologic studies of sensory gating in schizophrenia: Comparison of auditory and visual responses. Biological Psychiatry. 1985;20(12):1284–1296. - PubMed
    1. Adler LE, Waldo MC, Tatcher A, Cawthra E, Baker N, Freedman R. Lack of relationship of auditory gating defects to negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research. 1990;3(2):131–138. - PubMed
    1. Allen JS, Matsunaga K, Hacisalihzade S, Stark L. Smooth pursuit eye movements of normal and schizophrenic subjects tracking an unpredictable target. Biological Psychiatry. 1990;28(8):705–720. - PubMed