Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Feb 17:338:b95.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.b95.

Adolescents' use of purpose built shade in secondary schools: cluster randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Adolescents' use of purpose built shade in secondary schools: cluster randomised controlled trial

Suzanne J Dobbinson et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether students use or avoid newly shaded areas created by shade sails installed at schools.

Design: Cluster randomised controlled trial with secondary schools as the unit of randomisation.

Setting: 51 secondary schools with limited available shade, in Australia, assessed over two spring and summer terms.

Participants: Students outside at lunch times.

Intervention: Purpose built shade sails were installed in winter 2005 at full sun study sites to increase available shade for students in the school grounds.

Main outcome measure: Mean number of students using the primary study sites during weekly observations at lunch time.

Results: Over the study period the mean change in students using the primary study site from pre-test to post-test was 2.63 (95% confidence interval 0.87 to 4.39) students in intervention schools and -0.03 (-1.16 to 1.09) students in control schools. The difference in mean change between groups was 2.67 (0.65 to 4.68) students (P=0.011).

Conclusions: Students used rather than avoided newly shaded areas provided by purpose built shade sails at secondary schools in this trial, suggesting a practical means of reducing adolescents' exposure to ultraviolet radiation.

Trial registration: Exempt.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

None
Flow of school clusters through study

Comment in

  • Sun protection in teenagers.
    Thieden E. Thieden E. BMJ. 2009 Mar 3;338:a2997. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2997. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19258355 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oliveria SA, Saraiya M, Geller AC, Heneghan MK, Jorgensen C. Sun exposure and risk of melanoma. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:131-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khlat M, Vail A, Parkin M, Green A. Mortality from melanoma in migrants to Australia: variation by age at arrival and duration of stay. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:1103-13. - PubMed
    1. Whiteman DC, Whiteman CA, Green AC. Childhood sun exposure as a risk factor for melanoma: a systematic review of epidemiologic studies. Cancer Causes Control 2001;12:69-82. - PubMed
    1. Staples M, Elwood M, Burton R, Williams J, Marks R, Giles G. Non-melanoma skin cancer in Australia: the 2002 national survey and trends since 1985. Med J Aust 2006;184:6-10. - PubMed
    1. Montague M, Borland R, Sinclair C. Slip! Slop! Slap! and SunSmart, 1980-2000: skin cancer control and 20 years of population-based campaigning. Health Educ Behav 2001;28:290-305. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources