Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar 1;15(5):1747-54.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1420. Epub 2009 Feb 17.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker for prediction of radiation-induced neurocognitive dysfunction

Affiliations

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker for prediction of radiation-induced neurocognitive dysfunction

Yue Cao et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether early assessment of cerebral microvessel injury can predict late neurocognitive dysfunction after brain radiation therapy (RT).

Experimental design: Ten patients who underwent partial brain RT participated in a prospective dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI was acquired prior to, at weeks 3 and 6 during, and 1 and 6 months after RT. Neuropsychological tests were done pre-RT and at the post-RT MRI follow-ups. The correlations between early delayed changes in neurocognitive functions and early changes in vascular variables during RT were analyzed.

Results: No patients had tumor progression up to 6 months after RT. Vascular volumes and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability increased significantly in the high-dose regions during RT by 11% and 52% (P<0.05), respectively, followed by a decrease after RT. Changes in both vascular volume and BBB permeability correlated with the doses accumulated at the time of scans at weeks 3 and 6 during RT and 1 month after RT (P<0.03). Changes in verbal learning scores 6 months after RT were significantly correlated with changes in vascular volumes of left temporal (P<0.02) and frontal lobes (P<0.03), and changes in BBB permeability of left frontal lobes during RT (P<0.007). A similar correlation was found between recall scores and BBB permeability.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that the early changes in cerebral vasculature may predict delayed alterations in verbal learning and total recall, which are important components of neurocognitive function. Additional studies are required for validation of these findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The differences in the vascular volumes (Vp) and blood-brain barrier permeability (Ktrans) in three dose intervals at three observation times compared to the baseline values. In the high dose region (> 40 Gy), the vascular volumes increased significantly at week 6 during the course of RT and then started decreasing after the completion of RT; while in the intermediate dose interval (20−40 Gy), the vessel volume increased slowly, reached the similar maximum value 1 month after the completion of RT, and then started decreasing. The changes in the blood-brain barrier permeability were significant in the high and intermediate dose regions at week 6 during the course of RT. 10 weeks: 1 month after the completion of RT; and 32 weeks: 6 months after the completion of RT.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plots of the changes in the vascular volumes (Vp, top) and blood-brain permeability (Ktrans, bottom) versus doses received at the time of MRI studies. Left panels: week 3 during RT; Middle panels: week 6 during RT; Right panels: 1 month after the completion of RT (10 weeks from the start of RT). Solid lines represent linear regression lines.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The correlations between the changes in learning scores 6 months after RT and the changes in Vp of left frontal (left top) and temporal (right top) lobes at week 3 during RT, between the changes in learning scores 6 months after RT and the changes in Ktrans of left frontal lobes at week3 during RT (left bottom), and between the changes in total recall scores 6 months after RT and the changes in Ktrans of left temporal lobes at week 3 during RT (right bottom).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schultheiss TE, Kun LE, Ang KK, Stephens LC. Radiation response of the central nervous system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31(5):1093–112. - PubMed
    1. Tofilon PJ, Fike JR. The radioresponse of the central nervous system: a dynamic process. Radiat Res. 2000;153(4):357–70. - PubMed
    1. Khuntia D, Brown P, Li J, Mehta MP. Whole-brain radiotherapy in the management of brain metastasis. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(8):1295–304. - PubMed
    1. Klein M, Heimans JJ, Aaronson NK, van der Ploeg HM, Grit J, Muller M, Postma TJ, Mooij JJ, Boerman RH, Beute GN, Ossenkoppele GJ, van Imhoff GW, Dekker AW, Jolles J, Slotman BJ, Struikmans H, Taphoorn MJ. Effect of radiotherapy and other treatment-related factors on mid-term to long-term cognitive sequelae in low-grade gliomas: a comparative study. Lancet. 2002;360(9343):1361–8. - PubMed
    1. Mehta MP, Shapiro WR, Glantz MJ, Patchell RA, Weitzner MA, Meyers CA, Schultz CJ, Roa WH, Leibenhaut M, Ford J, Curran W, Phan S, Smith JA, Miller RA, Renschler MF. Lead-in phase to randomized trial of motexafin gadolinium and whole-brain radiation for patients with brain metastases: centralized assessment of magnetic resonance imaging, neurocognitive, and neurologic end points. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(16):3445–53. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms