The intermediate coronary care unit. A stage in continued coronary care
- PMID: 192257
- PMCID: PMC483245
- DOI: 10.1136/hrt.39.4.357
The intermediate coronary care unit. A stage in continued coronary care
Abstract
The concept of continued and progressive coronary care rather than intermediate coronary care is proposed. At each clinical stage the patient may be at risk and his management needs to be planned appropriately--prevention of the development of coronary disease, prehospital care, acute coronary care, subacute coronary care, and late hospital stay. Meticulous continued care once the patient leaves the hospital and returns home may be needed for a long time. Although the benefit of an intermediate coronary care unit has not yet been proved, significant patient risk continues beyond 12 days of hospital admission. High risk patient subsets are emerging requiring careful continued monitoring and the ability to undertake emergency measures as needed, and this is particularly so in patients suffering large anterior infarction, in those with infarction associated with cardiac failure, when infarction is associated with fascicular block and other types of conduction disturbances, and in patients who continue with rhythm disturbances after their admission to the hospital. Electrocardiograph leads III and VI displayed simultaneously should be routinely monitored in patients with fascicular blocks and acute anterior infarction as a guide to instituting prophylactic transvenous pacemaking. The continuation of intensive patient care and monitoring beyond the usual 2 to 5 days in a coronary care unit allows early mobilisation of patients in safety, thus speeding their ultimate rehabilitation. There is, as yet, no satisfactory study documenting the need for intermediate coronary care units, but much presumptive evidence is available to indicate that this is so. A carefully controlled randomised study would be invaluable.
Similar articles
-
Care of patients with a low probability of acute myocardial infarction. Cost effectiveness of alternatives to coronary-care-unit admission.N Engl J Med. 1984 May 17;310(20):1301-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198405173102006. N Engl J Med. 1984. PMID: 6425687
-
[Intermediate coronary care units: rationale, infrastructure, equipment, and referral criteria].Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007 Apr;60(4):404-14. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17521549 Spanish.
-
Do patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in Killip class I need intensive cardiac care after a successful primary percutaneous intervention?Acute Card Care. 2009;11(4):243-6. doi: 10.1080/17482940903362588. Acute Card Care. 2009. PMID: 19995263
-
From the coronary care unit to the cardiovascular intensive care unit: the evolution of cardiac critical care.Cardiol Clin. 2013 Nov;31(4):485-92, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Sep 20. Cardiol Clin. 2013. PMID: 24188215 Review.
-
Acute myocardial infarction: coronary care unit, hospital ward or home management?Acta Cardiol. 1979;34(4):269-78. Acta Cardiol. 1979. PMID: 388959 Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources