Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb 20:4:1.
doi: 10.1186/1749-7221-4-1.

CRPS of the upper or lower extremity: surgical treatment outcomes

Affiliations

CRPS of the upper or lower extremity: surgical treatment outcomes

A Lee Dellon et al. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj. .

Abstract

The hypothesis is explored that CRPS I (the "new" RSD) persists due to undiagnosed injured joint afferents, and/or cutaneous neuromas, and/or nerve compressions, and is, therefore, a misdiagnosed form of CRPS II (the "new" causalgia). An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review on a series of 100 consecutive patients with "RSD" identified 40 upper and 30 lower extremity patients for surgery based upon their history, physical examination, neurosensory testing, and nerve blocks. Based upon decreased pain medication usage and recovery of function, outcome in the upper extremity, at a mean of 27.9 months follow-up (range of 9 to 81 months), gave results that were excellent in 40% (16 of 40 patients), good in 40% (16 of 40 patients) and failure 20% (8 of 40 patients). In the lower extremity, at a mean of 23.0 months follow-up (range of 9 to 69 months) the results were excellent in 47% (14 of 30 patients), good in 33% (10 of 30 patients) and failure 20% (6 of 30 patients). It is concluded that most patients referred with a diagnosis of CRPS I have continuing pain input from injured joint or cutaneous afferents, and/or nerve compressions, and, therefore, similar to a patient with CRPS II, they can be treated successfully with an appropriate peripheral nerve surgical strategy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burgess FW. In: Hand Surgery. Berger RA, Weiss A-PC, editor. Philadelphia: Lippencott, Williams & Wilkins; 2004. Pain Management; pp. 1823–1832.
    1. Merritt WH. In: Plastic Surgery. 2. Mathes SJ, Hentz VR, editor. Vol. 4. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy; pp. 823–874.
    1. Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain: Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. 4. Seattle: International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) Press; 1994. - PubMed
    1. Harke H, Gretenkort P, Ladleif HU, Rahman S. Spinal cord stimulation in sympathetically maintained complex regional pain syndrome type I with severe disability. A prospective clinical study. Eur J Pain. 2005;4:363–373. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.09.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nath RK, Mackinnon SE, Stelnicki E. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy. The controversy continues. Clin Plast Surg. 1996;4:435–446. - PubMed