How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings
- PMID: 19236705
- PMCID: PMC2662829
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-15
How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings
Abstract
Background: Adoption of EHRs by U.S. ambulatory practices has been slow despite the perceived benefits of their use. Most evaluations of EHR implementations in the literature apply to large practice settings. While there are similarities relating to EHR implementation in large and small practice settings, the authors argue that scale is an important differentiator. Focusing on small ambulatory practices, this paper outlines the benefits and barriers to EHR use in this setting, and provides a "field guide" for these practices to facilitate successful EHR implementation.
Discussion: The benefits of EHRs in ambulatory practices include improved patient care and office efficiency, and potential financial benefits. Barriers to EHRs include costs; lack of standardization of EHR products and the design of vendor systems for large practice environments; resistance to change; initial difficulty of system use leading to productivity reduction; and perceived accrual of benefits to society and payers rather than providers. The authors stress the need for developing a flexible change management strategy when introducing EHRs that is relevant to the small practice environment; the strategy should acknowledge the importance of relationship management and the role of individual staff members in helping the entire staff to manage change. Practice staff must create an actionable vision outlining realistic goals for the implementation, and all staff must buy into the project. The authors detail the process of implementing EHRs through several stages: decision, selection, pre-implementation, implementation, and post-implementation. They stress the importance of identifying a champion to serve as an advocate of the value of EHRs and provide direction and encouragement for the project. Other key activities include assessing and redesigning workflow; understanding financial issues; conducting training that is well-timed and meets the needs of practice staff; and evaluating the implementation process.
Summary: The EHR implementation experience depends on a variety of factors including the technology, training, leadership, the change management process, and the individual character of each ambulatory practice environment. Sound processes must support both technical and personnel-related organizational components. Additional research is needed to further refine recommendations for the small physician practice and the nuances of specific medical specialties.
Similar articles
-
Challenges to EHR implementation in electronic- versus paper-based office practices.J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):755-61. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0573-5. Epub 2008 Mar 28. J Gen Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18369679 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative analysis of an electronic health record (EHR) implementation in an academic ambulatory setting.Inform Prim Care. 2008;16(4):277-84. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v16i4.703. Inform Prim Care. 2008. PMID: 19192329
-
Benefiting from ambulatory EHR implementation: solidarity, six sigma, and willingness to strive.J Healthc Inf Manag. 2006 Winter;20(1):53-60. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2006. PMID: 16429959
-
Costs and benefits of health information technology.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006 Apr;(132):1-71. doi: 10.23970/ahrqepcerta132. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006. PMID: 17627328 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Selection and Implementation of an Electronic Health Record.PM R. 2017 May;9(5S):S4-S12. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.02.007. PM R. 2017. PMID: 28527502 Review.
Cited by
-
Lessons Learned from Implementation of Information and Communication Technologies in Spain's Healthcare Services: Issues and Opportunities.Appl Clin Inform. 2010 Oct 13;1(4):363-76. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2010-07-CR-0041. Print 2010. Appl Clin Inform. 2010. PMID: 23616846 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Decision Support: a 25 Year Retrospective and a 25 Year Vision.Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Aug 2;Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S103-16. doi: 10.15265/IYS-2016-s034. Yearb Med Inform. 2016. PMID: 27488402 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessing differences between physicians' realized and anticipated gains from electronic health record adoption.J Med Syst. 2011 Apr;35(2):151-61. doi: 10.1007/s10916-009-9352-z. Epub 2009 Aug 8. J Med Syst. 2011. PMID: 20703574
-
Adoption of electronic health records: a qualitative study of academic and private physicians and health administrators.Appl Clin Inform. 2011 May 25;2(2):165-76. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2011-01-RA-0003. Print 2011. Appl Clin Inform. 2011. PMID: 23616868 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Electronic Health Record Limitations and Time Expenditure in a German Medical Center.Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Oct;12(5):1082-1090. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739519. Epub 2021 Dec 22. Appl Clin Inform. 2021. PMID: 34937102 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Electronic Health Records Still Not Routine Part of Medical Practice, Says New Study. 2006. http://www.rwjf.org/pr/product.jsp?id=21882
-
- Baldwin Gary. News Feature: Paper Charts No More. (Data from Medical Group Management Association) 2006. http://www.qualitynet.org/dcs/ContentServer?c=MQNews&pagename=Medqic%2FM...
-
- Benchmarking ICT use among General Practitioners in Europe. 2008. http://www.ehealthnews.eu/content/view/1113/62/
-
- Schoen C, Guterman S, Shih A, Lau J, Kasimow S, Gauthier A, Davis K. Bending the Curve: Options for Achieving Savings and Improving Value in U.S. Health Spending. 2007. p. xi.http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Content/Publications/Fund-Reports/2007/D...
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources