Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb 24;72(8):732-7.
doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000343004.98599.45.

Sensitivity of current criteria for the diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Affiliations

Sensitivity of current criteria for the diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

O Piguet et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) relies on criteria that are constraining and potentially ambiguous. Some features are open to clinical interpretation and their prevalence unknown. This study investigated the sensitivity of current diagnostic criteria in a large group of patients with bvFTD.

Methods: Forty-five patients with clear evidence of bvFTD as judged by progressive clinical decline (>3 years) with marked frontal features and significant frontal brain atrophy on brain MRI were included. Thirty-two have died; pathologic confirmation of frontotemporal lobar degeneration was found in all 18 coming to autopsy. We established the prevalence of core and supportive diagnostic features at presentation and with disease progression.

Results: Only 25/45 patients (56%) showed all five core features necessary for a diagnosis of bvFTD at initial presentation and 33/45 (73%) as their disease progressed. Two core features, emotional blunting and loss of insight, were never observed in 25% and 13% of cases. Executive dysfunction, hyperorality, mental inflexibility, and distractibility were the only supportive features present in >50% of cases at initial presentation. Although not a diagnostic feature, impaired activities of daily living was present in 33/45 patients (73%).

Conclusions: Strict application of the criteria misses a significant proportion of patients. Many supportive features have low prevalence and are clinically not useful. Revision of the criteria to include level of certainty (definite, probable, possible) dependent on the number of features present and the presence of ancillary information (e.g., brain atrophy, neuropsychological abnormalities, impaired activities of daily living) is encouraged.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1 Prevalence of core features (A) and speech and language supportive features (B) of clinical behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia at initial presentation and with disease progression Among the core features, loss of insight includes lack of awareness, or denial of mental symptoms; emotional blunting includes loss of empathy and sympathy; impairment in personal conduct includes inertia and passivity or overactivity such as pacing; decline in social interpersonal conduct includes disinhibited behavior, tactlessness, and loss of social graces.
None
Figure 2 Prevalence of behavioral supportive features (A) and physical signs (B) in patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia at initial presentation and with disease progression Frequencies of the core and supportive clinical features in cases with postmortem confirmation did not differ from the cases without confirmation or from the patients who were still alive.

References

    1. Bozeat S, Gregory CA, Ralph MA, Hodges JR. Which neuropsychiatric and behavioural features distinguish frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer’s disease? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:178–186. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graham A, Davies R, Xuereb J, et al. Pathologically proven frontotemporal dementia presenting with severe amnesia. Brain 2005;128:597–605. - PubMed
    1. Kramer JH, Jurik J, Sha SJ, et al. Distinctive neuropsychological patterns in frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, and Alzheimer disease. Cogn Behav Neurol 2003;16:211–218. - PubMed
    1. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 1998;51:1546–1554. - PubMed
    1. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Kipps CM, et al. Diagnostic criteria for the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD): current limitations and future directions. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2007;21:S14–18. - PubMed

Publication types