Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb 24:7:16.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-16.

The psychosocial screen for cancer (PSSCAN): further validation and normative data

Affiliations

The psychosocial screen for cancer (PSSCAN): further validation and normative data

Wolfgang Linden et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: We have previously reported on the development of a cancer-specific screening instrument for anxiety and depression (PSSCAN). No information on cut-off scores or their meaning for diagnosis was available when PSSCAN was first described. Needed were additional analyses to recommend empirically justified cut-off scores as well as data norms for healthy adult samples so as to lend meaning to the recommended cut-off scores.

Methods: We computed sensitivity/specificity indices based on a sample of 101 cancer patients who had provided PSSCAN data on anxiety and depression and who had completed another standardized instrument with strong psychometrics. Next, we compared mean scores for four samples with known differences in health status, a healthy community sample (n = 561), a sample of patients with a representative mix of cancer subtypes (n = 570), a more severely ill sample of in-patients with cancer (n = 78), and a community sample with a chronic illness other than cancer (n = 85).

Results: Sensitivity/specificity analyses revealed that an excellent balance of sensitivity/specificity was achievable with 92%/98% respectively for clinical anxiety and 100% and 86% respectively for clinical depression. Newly diagnosed patients with cancer were no more anxious than healthy community controls but showed elevations in depression scores. Both, patients with chronic illness other than cancer and those with longer-standing cancer diagnoses revealed greater levels of distress than newly diagnosed cancer patients or healthy adult controls.

Conclusion: These additional data on criterion validity and community versus patient norms for PSSCAN serve to enhance its utility for clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
a and b. Receiver Operating Curves for the Anxiety Subscale of the PSSCAN with the Anxiety Subscale of the HADS as the Criterion; Fig a: subclinical threshold; Fig b clinical threshold.
Figure 2
Figure 2
a and b. Receiver Operating Curves for the Depression Subscale of the PSSCAN with the Depression Subscale of the HADS as the Criterion; Fig a subclinical threshold; Fig b clinical threshold).

References

    1. Jacobson PB. Screening for psychological distress in cancer patients: Challenges and Opportunities. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4526–4527. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1367. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bultz BD, Carlson LE. Emotional Distress: The Sixth Vital Sign in Cancer Care. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6440–6441. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.3259. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carlson LE, Bultz BD. Benefits of psychosocial oncology care: Improved quality of life and medical care offset. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:8. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Girgis A, Boyes A. Proactive routine monitoring and intervention to reduce the psychosocial impact of cancer therapy. Clinical Psychologist. 2005;9:70–73. doi: 10.1080/13284200500221102. - DOI
    1. Linden W, Satin J. Avoidable Pitfalls in Behavioral Medicine Outcome Research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2007;33:143–147. doi: 10.1007/BF02879895. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types