Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 May;14(2):182-206.
doi: 10.1177/1077559508326223. Epub 2009 Feb 24.

Do early childhood interventions prevent child maltreatment? A review of research

Affiliations
Review

Do early childhood interventions prevent child maltreatment? A review of research

Arthur J Reynolds et al. Child Maltreat. 2009 May.

Abstract

We reviewed the empirical evidence on whether early childhood primary prevention programs can reduce rates of child abuse and neglect. Fifteen studies of 14 programs for children ages birth to 5 years were completed from 1990 to 2007 and assessed impacts with methodological rigor. All but one of the programs intervened from birth to age 3 through home visits, parent education classes, or the provision of health services. The weighted average effect size of program participation was a 2.9 percentage-point reduction in maltreatment (6.6% vs. 9.5%), which is equivalent to a 31% reduction in the rate of maltreatment and a fifth of a standard deviation. Of the five programs showing significant reductions in substantiated rates of child maltreatment, three provide strong evidence of preventive effects. Only the Child-Parent Centers (CPCs) and the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) assessed longer term preventive effects. Common elements of these effective programs included implementation by professional staff, relatively high dosage and intensity, and comprehensiveness of scope. The major conclusion is that the evidence base for programs in early childhood to prevent child maltreatment remains relatively weak. To advance the field, more longer term studies of a variety of intervention models are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adams S, Osofsky J, Hammer JH, Graham M. Program evaluation: Florida infant & young child mental health pilot project: Final report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University Center for Prevention & Early Intervention Policy; 2003.
    1. Aos S, Lieb R, Mayfield J, Miller M, Pennucci A. Benefits and costs of prevention and early intervention programs for youth: Technical appendix (No. 04-07-3901) Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy; 2004.
    1. Barrera M, Sandler IN. Prevention: A report of progress and momentum into the future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2006;13:221–226.
    1. Barth RP. An experimental evaluation of in-home child abuse prevention services. Child Abuse & Neglect. 1991;15:363–375. - PubMed
    1. Bickman L, editor. Advances in program theory. New directions for program evaluation series. 47. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1990.

Publication types