Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar;18(1):41-9.
doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2009.00010.

The Asthma Control Test (ACT) as a predictor of GINA guideline-defined asthma control: analysis of a multinational cross-sectional survey

Affiliations

The Asthma Control Test (ACT) as a predictor of GINA guideline-defined asthma control: analysis of a multinational cross-sectional survey

Mike Thomas et al. Prim Care Respir J. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate whether the Asthma Control Test (ACT) score is predictive of Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline-defined classification levels of asthma control. The ACT is a validated, 5-item, patient-completed measure of asthma control with a recall period of four weeks.

Methods: Cross-sectional survey comparing ACT score and GINA classification of asthma control among 2949 patients attending primary care physicians and specialists in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK, and the USA.

Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for ACT score predicting GINA control was 0.84 (95% CI 0.82-0.85). An ACT score of <19 (not well-controlled asthma) correctly predicted GINA-defined partly controlled/uncontrolled asthma 94% of the time, while an ACT score of >20 predicted GINA-defined controlled asthma 51% of the time, with kappa statistic of 0.42, representing moderate agreement.

Conclusions: An ACT score <19 is useful for identifying patients with poorly controlled asthma as defined by GINA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Elizabeth V Hillyer has received freelance writing assignments from Merck and Aerocrine. She has no shares in any pharmaceutical company. Professor David Price has consultant arrangements with: Altana, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Ivax and Pfizer. He or his team have received grants and research support for research in respiratory disease from the following organisations: UK National Health Service, Altana Pharma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Ivax, Merck Sharpe and Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and Schering Plough. Professor Price has also spoken for: Altana Pharma, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sharpe and Dohme and Pfizer. Angela E. Williams and Jacqueline R Carranza Rosenzweig are employees of GlaxoSmithKline.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances