An unbiased scientific record should be everyone's agenda
- PMID: 19243217
- PMCID: PMC2646782
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000038
An unbiased scientific record should be everyone's agenda
Abstract
This month's editorial discusses ways in which the process of publishing scientific research can be inappropriately influenced by varied forms of bias and the effects of competing interests. The editors propose five ways in which individuals involved in the publication process can mitigate the effects of biased agendas on the published scientific record.
References
-
- Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA. 1990;263:1385–1389. - PubMed
-
- Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: Comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 2004;291:2457–2465. - PubMed
-
- Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research. JAMA. 2003;289:454–465. - PubMed
-
- The PLoS Medicine Editors. Making sense of non-financial competing interests. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050199. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Davidoff F, DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Nicholls MG, Hoey J, et al. Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:825–826. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
