Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr;37(3):316-25.
doi: 10.3758/MC.37.3.316.

The spacing effect in intentional and incidental free recall by children and adults: Limits on the automaticity hypothesis

Affiliations

The spacing effect in intentional and incidental free recall by children and adults: Limits on the automaticity hypothesis

Thomas C Toppino et al. Mem Cognit. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Preschoolers, elementary school children, and college students exhibited a spacing effect in the free recall of pictures when learning was intentional. When learning was incidental and a shallow processing task requiring little semantic processing was used during list presentation, young adults still exhibited a spacing effect, but children consistently failed to do so. Children, however, did manifest a spacing effect in incidental learning when an elaborate semantic processing task was used. These results limit the hypothesis that the spacing effect in free recall occurs automatically and constrain theoretical accounts of why the spacing between repetitions affects recall performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jul;30(4):796-800 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Aging. 1989 Mar;4(1):3-9 - PubMed
    1. Mem Cognit. 1979 Mar;7(2):95-112 - PubMed
    1. Mem Cognit. 1973 Dec;1(4):430-4 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Bull. 2006 May;132(3):354-80 - PubMed

Publication types