The legacy of the Hwang case: research misconduct in biosciences
- PMID: 19247809
- DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9121-x
The legacy of the Hwang case: research misconduct in biosciences
Abstract
This paper focuses on the infamous case of Hwang Woo Suk, the South-Korean national hero and once celebrated pioneer of stem cell research. After briefly discussing the evolution of his publication and research scandal in Science, I will attempt to outline the main reactions that emerged within scientific and bioethical discourses on the problem of research misconduct in contemporary biosciences. What were the ethical lapses in his research? What kind of research misconduct has been identified? How this kind of misconduct affects scientific integrity? How to avoid it? Focusing on these questions, the paper interprets the Hwang's case as a case study that might shed light on the worst aspects of highstakes global science. This case presents a group of problems that might endanger scientific integrity and public trust. Regulatory oversight, ethical requirements and institutional safeguards are often viewed by the scientific community as merely decelerating scientific progress and causing delays in the application of treatments. The Hwang's case represents how unimpeded progress works in contemporary science. Thus, the case might shed light on the often neglected benefits of "the social control of science".
Similar articles
-
Ethical modernization: research misconduct and research ethics reforms in Korea following the Hwang affair.Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):355-80. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9341-8. Epub 2012 Jan 5. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013. PMID: 22218997
-
Oversight framework over oocyte procurement for somatic cell nuclear transfer: comparative analysis of the Hwang Woo Suk case under South Korean bioethics law and U.S. guidelines for human embryonic stem cell research.Theor Med Bioeth. 2009;30(5):367-84. doi: 10.1007/s11017-009-9113-5. Epub 2009 Aug 4. Theor Med Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19653124
-
Don't rush to rehabilitate Hwang.Nature. 2014 Jan 23;505(7484):453. doi: 10.1038/505453a. Nature. 2014. PMID: 24459716 No abstract available.
-
Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):214-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023721. J Med Ethics. 2008. PMID: 18316467 Review.
-
Research integrity and academic medicine: the pressure to publish and research misconduct.J Osteopath Med. 2024 Feb 27;124(5):187-194. doi: 10.1515/jom-2023-0211. eCollection 2024 May 1. J Osteopath Med. 2024. PMID: 38407191 Review.
Cited by
-
Judge the article, not the author.Croat Med J. 2010 Aug;51(4):357-8. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.357. Croat Med J. 2010. PMID: 20718090 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The Embassy of Good Science - a community driven initiative to promote ethics and integrity in research.Open Res Eur. 2023 Jan 12;2:27. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14422.2. eCollection 2022. Open Res Eur. 2023. PMID: 37767226 Free PMC article.
-
Research Integrity Among PhD Students at the Faculty of Medicine: A Comparison of Three Scandinavian Universities.J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Oct;15(4):320-329. doi: 10.1177/1556264620929230. Epub 2020 Jun 12. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020. PMID: 32532174 Free PMC article.
-
An analysis on the research ethics cases managed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) between 1997 and 2010.Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Dec;18(4):621-31. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9273-3. Epub 2011 Apr 29. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012. PMID: 21528428
-
A retrospective analysis of the trend of retracted publications in the field of biomedical and life sciences.Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Sep;17(3):459-68. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9212-8. Epub 2010 Jun 2. Sci Eng Ethics. 2011. PMID: 20517712
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Personal name as subject
- Actions
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources